Yes paci- even though I plan to BF. My dr. said the reason they say no paci's if bf is because a lot of moms "shut the kid up" with the paci when they are actually hungry... so make sure LO isn't hungry THEN give the paci.
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
i plan on breastfeeding as well, but i will give Owen a pacifier for the same reason (i read that it greatly reduces the risk of SIDS). however, i dont plan on giving it to him until he at least latches on and is BFing.
I thought that if you are BF you are not supposed to give the pacifier for the first month or so? Or is it not at all? I plan to give LO a pacifier if she will take it.
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
I plan to play it a bit by ear. I dont really want to introduce anything other than nursing until BF'ing is well established. Some babies might be well established in a week some might take a bit longer. I plan to just see how LO does with BF'ing and then if they even want a paci.
I have a few friends on both sides of this. Some have had a harder time with BF'ing if the paci was introduced too soon while others have had no issues. I think it comes down to knowing your baby!
Sometimes it is associated with babies having trouble nursing. So they suggest if you really want to nurse and do everything to make it work, then it might help to wait until BFing is well established before introducing the pacifier.
They say not to give a pacifier when you're breastfeeding because it can cause nipple confusion. Same with not giving baby a bottle. But that's only until a good breastfeeding routine has been established. And in regards to SIDS, breastfeeding is also shown to reduce the risk of SIDS. The thing about pacifiers reducing the risk of SIDS is that it's said to keep them more alert, the sucking keeps them breathing or something like that.
Honestly, I gave both my son's pacifiers and they were both breastfed. Neither one had nipple confusion. My oldest took the pacifier until he was 3 months and then started sucking his fingers. My youngest never took to the pacifier and sucked on his fist until he found his thumb.
I'm planning to BF and use a paci as well, but I'm just curious as to why they say using one would reduce the risk of sids? Does the article elaborate?
I have to laugh when people have plans to wait for the binky or not do one at all. Each baby is unique and different- some have a stronger urge to suckle than others. They won't get "confused"- it is all about preference.
Every breastfed baby I know got a binky at the hospital and did PERFECT with nursing.
My firstborn was a binky baby. When she was older she had to have one in her mouth and one in each hand! It was ridiculous.
My second daughter would gag on binkies and spit them out. She hated them and never had one.
I'm planning to BF and use a paci as well, but I'm just curious as to why they say using one would reduce the risk of sids? Does the article elaborate?
It says it keeps them from falling into a deep sleep which is one of the things that is thought to cause SIDS.
I plan to play it a bit by ear. I dont really want to introduce anything other than nursing until BF'ing is well established. Some babies might be well established in a week some might take a bit longer. I plan to just see how LO does with BF'ing and then if they even want a paci.
I have a few friends on both sides of this. Some have had a harder time with BF'ing if the paci was introduced too soon while others have had no issues. I think it comes down to knowing your baby!
This pretty much sums up my thoughts. My other two didn't have any issues with BFing and having the paci. But..we'll just see how it goes this time around.
I read to not give them until they are a month old so they are used to latching and BFing. Apparently it said that there is a very low risk of SIDS during the first one.
i'm pretty positive they have no idea what causes SIDS, and im definately not convinced that a pacifier reduces the risk. but anyways... i plan on BFing and i will not be offering a pacifier at anytime. this has nothing to do with nipple confusion or anything other than my parents never gave me a pacifier, and i think they are a bit ridiculous, not to mention VERY difficult to take away once baby is accustomed to having one. if she never gets it, she cant miss it, right?!
i'm pretty positive they have no idea what causes SIDS, and im definately not convinced that a pacifier reduces the risk. but anyways... i plan on BFing and i will not be offering a pacifier at anytime. this has nothing to do with nipple confusion or anything other than my parents never gave me a pacifier, and i think they are a bit ridiculous, not to mention VERY difficult to take away once baby is accustomed to having one. if she never gets it, she cant miss it, right?!
I agree, but recommendations such as putting your baby on his back and keeping soft bedding out of the crib has drastically reduced the number of babies that die from SIDS. Since I've never been against the whole paci concept, I guess I'm willing to use it and hope they are right.
We will try a pacifier. I have no problems with it. DD used one, but DS refused any sort of artificial nipple, including bottles. With DD it didn't cause any BFing problems. I didn't have a single problem till I started on the mini pill, then got pregnant. Her binky never made a difference and she always took well to the breast, and a bottle when we introduced that when I thought I was going back to work.
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
I read that the greatest risk of SIDS is between 1 and 6 months, so ideally I will wait til 1 month of age for the paci. Now, in all reality, he may want one immediately in which case I plan to give him one. They have those ones that they give at the hospital that are supposedly the least likely to cause nipple confusion so I plan to use that kind mostly.
Re: I just read an article about how pacifiers reduce the risk of SIDS
I plan to play it a bit by ear. I dont really want to introduce anything other than nursing until BF'ing is well established. Some babies might be well established in a week some might take a bit longer. I plan to just see how LO does with BF'ing and then if they even want a paci.
I have a few friends on both sides of this. Some have had a harder time with BF'ing if the paci was introduced too soon while others have had no issues. I think it comes down to knowing your baby!
Sometimes it is associated with babies having trouble nursing. So they suggest if you really want to nurse and do everything to make it work, then it might help to wait until BFing is well established before introducing the pacifier.
They say not to give a pacifier when you're breastfeeding because it can cause nipple confusion. Same with not giving baby a bottle. But that's only until a good breastfeeding routine has been established. And in regards to SIDS, breastfeeding is also shown to reduce the risk of SIDS. The thing about pacifiers reducing the risk of SIDS is that it's said to keep them more alert, the sucking keeps them breathing or something like that.
Honestly, I gave both my son's pacifiers and they were both breastfed. Neither one had nipple confusion. My oldest took the pacifier until he was 3 months and then started sucking his fingers. My youngest never took to the pacifier and sucked on his fist until he found his thumb.
Just do whatever you feel is right for your baby.
I have to laugh when people have plans to wait for the binky or not do one at all. Each baby is unique and different- some have a stronger urge to suckle than others. They won't get "confused"- it is all about preference.
Every breastfed baby I know got a binky at the hospital and did PERFECT with nursing.
My firstborn was a binky baby. When she was older she had to have one in her mouth and one in each hand! It was ridiculous.
My second daughter would gag on binkies and spit them out. She hated them and never had one.
Can I get a link to that article?
It says it keeps them from falling into a deep sleep which is one of the things that is thought to cause SIDS.
Link
Here's another one
It's claiming they reduce the risk by 90%.
This pretty much sums up my thoughts. My other two didn't have any issues with BFing and having the paci. But..we'll just see how it goes this time around.
I agree, but recommendations such as putting your baby on his back and keeping soft bedding out of the crib has drastically reduced the number of babies that die from SIDS. Since I've never been against the whole paci concept, I guess I'm willing to use it and hope they are right.
I linked both articles above.