I work for a small company (50 employees, globally). We all work from home offices. They don't have an official maternity policy, but have been working on it since I and another coworker are pregnant.
They gave us the draft today. We get up to 12 weeks leave, unpaid. They will pay for 3 of the weeks, but here's the kicker....it won't get paid until we return to work full time for 6 months.The thing that really pissed me off is that they will give 1 week pd leave for paternity leave, but that one does not have the language in it about it being paid after they have returned for 6 months.
I know I should be grateful for any kind of paid time, but since we have to float the money up front it doesn't really help and I am feeling super pressured to go back to work as soon as I can (like take only 4 weeks).
I am our breadwinner and sole provider after LO arrives. Guess I'm just feeling stressed and pressured.
Re: Disappointed in Maternity leave policy
What? They give paid paternity leave but not maternity? Do they realize the baby actually comes out of you? You need time to recover from that not to mention time to bond with the baby.
I would question this policy.
I don't think it's that bad. At leas you're getting some money back to you. Very few women have fully or even partially paid maternity leave.
Had I not decided to SAH I would have gotten 6 weeks at partial pay through the state of CA and could take another 12 weeks totally unpaid. I could use PTO to supplement though.
When we were TTC we just saved 18 weeks of my income so that we wouldn't be worrying about money and I could enjoy my maternity leave.
It's still better than my company's policy...we get up to 12 weeks leave...but none of it is paid.
And, it is pretty crazy and wrong that who know that they aren't going to return after maternity leave don't tell their employers until after they get paid for the leave...but it happens. When I was pregnant with DS, the boards that I frequented then (I can't remember where) there were women who talked openly about planning to screw their company out of the maternity leave. There then were the women who fully intend to go back to work and then change their mind later. (I'd say that it's pretty rare for a father to take his 1 week of paternity leave and then decide not to return, which is why the policy doesn't make them wait.)
Maybe you can suggest that they change the policy to pay right away but you sign something that you are liable to pay it back if you leave within 6 months. (This would work better if you are on bi-weekly pay, as they could at least take 2 weeks worth out of your last check.) They may not go for it...but it can't hurt to suggest it.
I was just hoping for better. They haven't had a pregnant female in many years, hence no policy. They really have tried to take care of us in all of our other benefits, so I was just a little saddened by the strictness of the getting paid 6 months later thing. I'm hoping they will revise that to getting paid the 3 weeks and then it must be paid back if you leave within 6 months (which I would think would accomplish the same goal but with much less pain).
We don't fall under FMLA, which wouldn't really come into play anyway because being out for 12 weeks and still keeping my job isn't in question.
I was thinking the same thing...they are trying to protect themselves against paying employees who end up leaving. I think suggesting signing a contract agreeing to pay the money back 100% if you don't complete 6 months of work after you return is a good compromise.
Request that they revise the policy so that one of the three weeks matches the Paternity leave and the two additional weeks are 3 months after return to full time. I say 3 months because that is the standard for benefits to begin when you are a new employee. 6 months is pretty ridiculous.
I believe with FMLA the company has to have more than 50 employees within 75 miles of each other.
I'm going with this. We don't get any paid leave.