My friend and I were discussing this topic. It took her 18 months to conceive her first, 2 rounds of clomid/ iui and finally injectables/iui that did it. I have gotten pregnant relatively easy but misscarried each time.
She says she would almost rather get pregnant and m/c so she knows her body is "working"
. I feel like either way it sucks. What's the point of getting pregnant if you still don't have a baby?? There are treatments for TTC no treatment to prevent a m/c when all your tests are normal.
meh I can almost handle taking one m/c for the team (cause they are so common blah blah blah). but, recurrent ones are ridiculous. I'd rather get AF instead of sufferring another loss.
[Poll]
Re: Please discuss....(also clicky poll)
I think TTTC would be easier for me to accept. DH and I had discussed that as a possibility previously and what we would do. We never expected to get pg easily and then miscarry repeatedly. It's a whole other ballgame emotionally for me.
I picked the third one...I felt so quilty today because I woke up thinking..god I would be ovulating right now if I wasnt pregnant and had a m/c last month...thats horrible! I feel so quilty thinking man I wish I just didnt get pregnant and went through everything and would just have to wait a few more months to get a BFP!
Anyone else feel like this sometimes??
Hmm, I wonder what the results would be like if you posted this on TTTC.
Also, I know they both suck, but I kind of feel like that answer is a cop-out. (Sorry gals.)
I picked the third one too. I can see your friend's side too, but I think both scenarios suck equally.
If you TTC forever and think your body doesnt work it is devastating. Yes they can usually treat it but the cost is so incredible and still no guarantees that they will work
If you continually m/c then you still think your body isnt working and it is devastating. Yes they can test and maybe find something wrong...again cost can be incredible and there is no guarantee.
I think the only difference here is really once you get a BFP. Those of us that continually mc will spend the next long months in agony obsessing over every twinge and inspecting every piece of TP that comes in contact with our vajayjay. I dont think those TTTC would be in the same position at that point.
You gain strength, courage and confidence by every experience in which you stop to look fear in the face. -Eleanor Roosevelt
After 1 year of TTC#2 BFP May 2011 m/c #3 4w2d. Off to RE.
Round 1: Femara + Ovidrel +TI = BFP! EDD 2/20/12
2IF does not always equal 3IF...Surprise!
Coming from the place of it taking a team full of Drs to get me PG
and miscarrying every time I do...
I vote for #3
I don't think there should be a comparison - hurt is hurt, unless you are there and experiencing it you do not know how much it sucks. Why must there be a pain olympics.
What I would really prefer is noone need to go through m/c or t-ttc to get what they desire, a healthy little baby in their arms.
After 7 years trying to concieve, 3 failed IUIs and 2 failed IVFs, my third IVF was a success!
My Christmas baby turned into a turkey bird! Dillon Richard was born at 34 weeks, 5 days on November 28, 2009 after 10 weeks on bedrest for preeclampsia.
<a href="http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v705/arriinthere/PJ/?action=view
I picked 3, They both suck. And when you have them both together, they make each other suck even more.
I guess the question is, do you like to take the pain in concentrated form or would your rather add some water and have it drag out through the years? Or perhaps you'd like both? Either way it's pain, it sucks, and you can't pick which way it happens to you.
I think they both suck
I think they both suck, badly.
Badly.
My Blog
This is why I voted for #2. They both definitely suck - but I'd rather have trouble and get a sticky baby in the end.
This. I am coming over from TTTC and it kind of upsets me that a quiz like this is even here. I don't get why women are constantly trying to play the pain Olympics. It sucks to m/c, it sucks to have trouble TTC, and it sucks to have the two put together. But I don't understand how someone can say that one of those options is "easier".
as someone who has dealt with both, i couldn't agree more. the pain of m/c is terrible. but i don't think it is better or worse than the pain of having tttc. and to say the pain of tttc is "watered down over a long period of time" is complete and utter bs. every month you deal with the pain that you can't do what seems to come naturally to everyone around you. and not only do you have to make a huge time commitment to whatever medical regimen your dr and you decided is best, you then have to fight with health insurance to get what is owed to you, that's if your lucky and don't have to pay for these incredibly costly treatments out of pocket.
the grass isn't greener on either side of this fence. no one's "tragedy" is better or worse than any one else's. the sad reality is that many of us who have tttc are statistically at a higer risk for m/c, and many of us have suffered them. so we have to jump through hoops for our bfp and then be scared, just like you.
I picked the third option. I've dealt with both. I'd want neither of them as they both are painful.
For TTTC it is difficult to hear other women talk about how they're planning out their babies. I've had a few friends say that they decided to try X month, because Y and Z months wouldn't be the best fot them, and TADA, they're pregnant. I think that is the frustration behind the phrase of "at least you can get pregnant".
Of course it is just as scary to have m/cs and always fear if this current/next pregnancy will end up the same.
So I don't think you can compare them against each other. Its like comparing apples to oranges. Yes, they're both fruit, but they're not the same kind!
2 years of TTC, Seeing RE Feb 09, 2 medicated TI cycles - BFNs, 3 medicated IUIs - BFNs, back to medicated TI cycles until IVF approval, IVF approved in March 2010. BFP on last medicated TI cycle.
THIS!!! Totally.