I've been reading alot of this lately. I really like how it may help with pain control (because the baby's head is cushioned for longer) and also the decreased risk of infection (even though this doesn't happen often). I'm completely willing to have an epidural, but I figure if I can hold out that much longer, or possibly not need one at all, then that would be great. Obviously this may not happen in my situation and I still need to talk to my OB about it to make sure the hospital will be willing (whatever OBs on shift when I deliver will be there, unfortunately).
Just wondering if anyone else had given it any thought.
Re: Anyone consider not having their water broken?
No.
My water was broken - our son's heartrate was getting erratic, so the doctor decided to do it to get the labor moving faster. At that point, because my body was not cooperating and LO was going to be in distress, it was best for our situation.
Note: It kinda sounded like a little "pop" when the doctor did it. I was more freaked out by the idea of it, but there was no pain.
I just read it and I find it very encouraging! Congrats!!
Blog: Baby Mama's Drama
It's nice to hear that I'm not the only one. I hadn't heard much about it on the boards over the last few months and was starting to feel wierd about asking my OB about it, especially if it was uncommon.