Seriously, people. If you're not a working mom when you're working 30 hours a week, what the heck are you? A SAHM? Is there anyone out there who works 20 or 30 hours a week that doesn't consider herself a working mom? I'm really curious.
FWIW, I realize this is a really divisive topic, and not in our best interest as women and mothers, but I'm just surprise nearly half of those responded think 31 hours a week is not "working".
Re: 30 hours a week and you're not a "working mom"?
~Benjamin Franklin
DS dx with celiac disease 5/28/10
That is insulting. ?It's nice to see that working women don't support those of us who are lucky enough to work part-time. ??
this
I wouldn't get too upset over that only because of the options given. It was 10 hours and then 32 hours with nothing in between.
Anywho... it's a touchy subject and everyone has their own opinion and no one is probably going to change their minds.
I think this is exactly right. I'm one of the people who picked 32 because there wasn't an option between 10 and 32.
Technically, of course, if you have a job other than your children, you are a working mom. In answering the poll, I was focused on deciding at what point is a woman working "enough" (for lack of a better word) that I probably have a lot the same concerns as she does... And I do think that's pretty far above 10 hours per week but probably not quite as high as 32 per week.
ditto. Chill out PT-ers. Some of us FT ones are just jealous!
LOL. I work 24 hours a week and consider myself a working mom.
I was one of the ones looking for a 20 hour/week option.
I totally agree that if you work at all you're a working mom. But if you work less than full time, you don't face exactly the same issues as those that do (i.e., needing to take vacation/sick time for every dr. appointment/school appointment, etc. never having a catch up day). I just figured that was more of the gist of the poll than to say that someone who worked part time wasn't a working mom. Really, this was not something to get upset about.