- Pregnancy
- Baby & Toddler
- Parents
- Getting Pregnant
- Baby Names
- Product Reviews
-
Registry
- Community
-
More
Want a personalized experience?
Download the free app
3rd Trimester
SharonWantsABaby
member
') ;
}
// -->
Carolyn Hax column
SharonWantsABaby
member
Does anyone read Carolyn Hax's advice column? Here's the newest one. The woman who wrote in seems like a piece of work. She "can't understand" why the ultimate decision should rest with the mother? 17 or not, you think someone ELSE should get to decide?? What is this, Nazi Germany?? Geez. Anyway, I like Carolyn's snarky response. 
Dear Carolyn:
My husband and I are "bidding" for a closed adoption through our church. The birth mother is 17 and already has a child. She is considering us as well as one other couple. This process involves a lot of waiting and is really fraying my nerves. We are the "better" couple -- higher income, more child-care experience, a son who can't wait to be a big brother, and we live in the suburbs (while the other family has a condo in the city). We have not yet met the mother, but the other couple has apparently established a friendly relationship with her. We hope to do the same over the summer, to help her decision process.
My problem is I cannot come to terms with the fact that the choice will ultimately rest with this girl. On paper, my husband and I are the easy choice. Nothing against the other couple, but I believe if it were up to an objective party, anyone would choose us. But the process is designed so that the girl has the final say, which I can't understand.
Why should it be her decision? She has already demonstrated questionable decision-making capabilities, and she will never know anything about us besides what she learns over a couple of casual lunches. We hope to make a good impression on her, but I am really going to pieces over the thought that maybe there are factors we won't be able to influence. Why is this okay???
-Atlanta
If I were the mom, your quickness to dismiss both the other couple and my right to make decisions for my baby would disqualify you without so much as a follow-up "casual lunch."
What I see are two families who want a child, and may both offer this baby a wonderful home -- neither one "better" than the other, just different. And I see a mother who got herself in a stupid spot but who is doing her best to get out of it, in the way that best serves her child.
If you can't get over yourself long enough to see this isn't a competition, but instead a community effort to save a life -- and, therefore, that any good home is a great outcome, even if the home isn't yours -- then I hope you'll recuse yourself from the "auction" altogether.
Yours truly, City-Dweller
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
This discussion has been closed.
Re: Carolyn Hax column
I've never read Carolyn Hax either, but omg that lady sounds nuts.
What sort of adoptive mother will she be that she's so quick to dismiss the biological mother? She'd probably be pouring poison in the poor kid's ear their whole life and tell them how worthless their biological mom is and how much better she is than her. No child deserves that.