After reading about how so many girls were induced and it ended up in a c-section, I am very nervous for tomorrow. I am supposed to go in for cervadil tomorrow night, then pitocin on Tues. I am apprehensive because I have not had any contractions, no feelings of labor and only partially losing my mucos plug. I know I can refuse it, so what should I do? Just looking for any guidance you can give. Thanks!
BTW: he is inducing because of the baby's size already. I have been measuring big since 32 weeks.
Re: s/o Not being induced
Good luck tomorrow, either way.
I have no advice, I ended up with a c-section =(
Curious to know what your LO?s size is at this moment? Mine is also large for the weeks I?m at. She?s now 5 and 1/2lbs at 31-weeks. I?ll be having a scheduled c-section 2 weeks before my due date.
At 37 weeks he told me baby was measuring 8 lbs. 6 oz. by ultrasound.
Thanks everyone for your responses. I am sure I am going to go through with it tomorrow night and see how the cervadil works before I start anything. I may even be more dilated (I haven't been checked since Wed.). Maybe I'll take the advice of talking to my doctor to see if I can go home if it fails! Thanks again, I feel much better after hearing the sucess stories!!
I'll keep everyone posted from the hosp.
This.
THe baby's size it just an estimate. And I've read that after 40 weeks they really don't grow much more so it's not like at 40 weeks you're going to have a 7 lb baby and at 41 weeks a 9 lb baby or anything like that. Often times people are induced for their size and the baby comes out way smallerthan what they said, so I don't think, that alone, is a good enough reason to induce.
Inducing puts stress on your body and the baby. Pitocin brings on contractions that are unnatural. They are stronger and longer than what is normal in labor, with less time in between them. That time in between is when baby gets oxygen back and takes a "break". With things like Pitocin (esp if you're not progressing and they keep turnign it up) baby doesn't get that recovery time and the health becomes to go down hill because of this. Pretty soon you're heading towards an emergency C section because the baby is in distress - all because of induction most times.
There is a time and place for many interventions, I think many are used way too soon and cause way too many other problems.
this is a really good post! When my doc told me they will likely want to induce due to my diabetes I was heart broken. I have heard alot of them ending in a C/S. I have also heard ( dunno how true) how some places will try to talk you into a C/S instead of letting you ride it out.
Well, this is a very personal decision, one that only you can make.
If I were in your shoes, I would refuse the induction. I don't think that baby measuring large for dates is a compelling medical reason to induce at 39 weeks. I am in the same boat as you - my baby has been measuring ginormously since 19 weeks, via fundal height and U/S measurements. This Thursday I'm having a growth U/S because I'm currently measuring 8 weeks ahead (fundal height - he hasn't been "weighed" via U/S since 32 weeks)... and unless they tell me he weighs 14 lbs or something ridiculous, I'm not going to consider an early induction.
Maybe it would be good to talk it over with your doc, before starting Pitocin anyway? You have a legitimate concern (that early inductions often result in C-sections) that I would want to discuss further before agreeing to induce early. I realize that there are many valid reasons for early inductions (polyhydramnios (sp?), pre-eclampsia, etc.), but a baby that's estimated to be large isn't technically one of them.
And, this is my first baby so it's not really for me to say, but several moms I know of babies that varied significantly in birth weight (say, 7 lbs vs 9 or 10) and delivered both vaginally have told me that the "better" birth did not necessarily correspond to the smaller baby. One example.... a friend of mine had a 7 pounder and a 9.5 pounder. The 9.5 pounder (first born) had a relatively easy labor and was pushed out in less than an hour. The 7 pounder was posterior and mom had horrendous back labor, hours of pushing, and ended up with 3rd degree tearing, including a urethral tear (shudder). This is just one scenario out of many, but it is something to keep in mind - baby's size isn't the only thing that makes birth easy or hard.
Good luck!
I am being induced this week as well. Here, they don't let you go more than 10 days past your due date for the following reasons:
1. by 10 days overdue the placenta can start to deteriorate and this is dangerous to the baby
OR
2. the placenta can keep functioning and your baby will continue to grow, resulting in a larger baby that can't fit through the birth canal and therefore you need a c-section
3. by this point your fluid levels drop and this can lead to cord prolapse, or the baby resting on the cord (because there is not enough fluid to float) and cut off oxygen
My Dr did say there is a slightly higher risk of c-section, but impossible to tell if you would've needed one anyway - i.e. if baby doesn't respond well to the contractions from oxytocin it is likely the baby wouldn't have responded well to natural contractions either. They can also turn down the pitocin if baby starts to not respond well - my Dr will do this before going to c-section.
I also know of quite a few people that ended up going into natural labour after having the gel. More than the number of people I have heard from that eneded up with c-sections.
Good Luck!
I completely understand your hesitation. I hope to avoid pitocin at all costs.
If I was in your shoes, I would probably be talking to my doctor about possible ways to induce labor that do not include pitocin. Cervadil, stripping membranes, nipple stimulation, herbs, etc. My doctor even told me about this balloon that they put inside you that puts pressure on the cervix to help it dialate.