baby names

Re: baby names

• MelissaAB5579 member

  February 2009

  Me!
  

  Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml

  Report0 Reply
• Loading the player...
• blondie223

  February 2009

  I was!

  

  Report0 Reply
• gallerygirl member

  February 2009

  me too.

   Anyone else not want their baby name in the top 100? I find that if a name is too popular, it turns me off.
  

  bfp #1 - 8/17/2008, natural m/c 8/25/2008, EDD 4/21/2009 bfp #2 - 10/6/2008, hb stopped at 7 w 3 d, d&e on 11/7/2008, EDD 6/19/2009 bfp #3- 3/14/2009.... stick, baby, stick!!!! (14 dpo - hcg 188, 16 dpo - hcg 421, 24 dpo - hcg 14,760!, 4/2 healthy HB of 130 bpm, 4/16 HB of 178 bpm!) bfp #4- 2/2/2011, EDD 10/17/2011
  a bfing, cding, wah momma Congrats to my buddies Tiffanylaw06, Jeny M & burghbaby!

  Report0 Reply
• str8ota member

  February 2009

  gallerygirl:

  me too.

   Anyone else not want their baby name in the top 100? I find that if a name is too popular, it turns me off.
  

  Our baby name for a boy dropped off the top 1000!  I'm thrilled because I feel the same way, I don't want my child to be 1 of 7 in his class.

  Report0 Reply
• lmbarrera

  February 2009

  Me too - my baby has to have a unique name!! 

  Report0 Reply
• BirdieBrd

  February 2009

  I did!  I love the name but it's an old name and even though I think it's a beautiful name I think it might be too old and not sure I'd want to use it...but anyway, it was ranked between 943-980 in the last 10 years.  I was surprised that it was even ranked.
  

  Report0 Reply