?Unethical and harmful?: the case against circumcising baby boys

bluesky53

https://theconversation.edu.au/unethical-and-harmful-the-case-against-circumcising-baby-boys-1543

A more lengthy read - https://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/2012/08/the-aap-report-on-circumcision-bad-science-bad-ethics-bad-medicine/

Circumcision rates in your state, hover over your state to see the actual percentage and if its still medicaid funded -  https://mgmbill.org/statistics.htm

Just for fun, post your state and its percentage and what you plan to do 

MJHershey

Reported.

(not because I think people should not have an opinion but because of low post count and spam like nature of post).  

chicsahm

mrsgerman:

MJHershey:

Reported.

(not because I think people should not have an opinion but because of low post count and spam like nature of post).  

 

I reported as well 

 

526SadieSadie

mrsgerman:

Are you only here to sway people to circumcise or not circumcise? Because last time I checked, what I choose to do with my future sons foreskin is not your damn business 

I don't know you, but I love you.  High five.

inthelost

mrsgerman:

Are you only here to sway people to circumcise or not circumcise? Because last time I checked, what I choose to do with my future sons foreskin is not your damn business 

THIS

bkeane619

I don't see anything wrong with it.  It was interesting to see the state data.  But then again I agree so...

CDMay2006

OP's post isn't spam.  There is no advertising involved, and OP isn't randomly posted it all over the place.  It may be a bit tactless to post it without an introduction (of themselves or the post), but regardless of whether you want to read it/"hear" what it has to say, it isn't spam.

CDMay2006

ncchnat:

CDMay2006:

OP's post isn't spam.  There is no advertising involved, and OP isn't randomly posted it all over the place.  It may be a bit tactless to post it without an introduction (of themselves or the post), but regardless of whether you want to read it/"hear" what it has to say, it isn't spam.

To be fair, this OP posted another anti-circ thread a few days ago with a picture of someone else's child she swiped off of FB. (It has since been edited by a mod.)

https://community.thebump.com/cs/ks/forums/1/72289871/ShowThread.aspx  I'm still not sure that makes it spam, but that is good context that I didn't have.

LnR70707

CDMay2006:

ncchnat:

CDMay2006:

OP's post isn't spam.  There is no advertising involved, and OP isn't randomly posted it all over the place.  It may be a bit tactless to post it without an introduction (of themselves or the post), but regardless of whether you want to read it/"hear" what it has to say, it isn't spam.

To be fair, this OP posted another anti-circ thread a few days ago with a picture of someone else's child she swiped off of FB. (It has since been edited by a mod.)

https://community.thebump.com/cs/ks/forums/1/72289871/ShowThread.aspx 

I'm still not sure that makes it spam, but that is good context that I didn't have.

No, it isn't, but OP might want to contribute something else to the community to avoid being labeled that or a troll.

kje120

OP - I get it, you're anti-circ.  Good for you, but I don't give a damn about your opinion.

TurtleMomma

mrsgerman:

Maybe this is the reincarnation of MrsMeag just trying to stir the pot for her next "research paper"

THIS!

bluesky53

ncchnat:

CDMay2006:

ncchnat:

CDMay2006:

OP's post isn't spam.  There is no advertising involved, and OP isn't randomly posted it all over the place.  It may be a bit tactless to post it without an introduction (of themselves or the post), but regardless of whether you want to read it/"hear" what it has to say, it isn't spam.

To be fair, this OP posted another anti-circ thread a few days ago with a picture of someone else's child she swiped off of FB. (It has since been edited by a mod.)

https://community.thebump.com/cs/ks/forums/1/72289871/ShowThread.aspx 

I'm still not sure that makes it spam, but that is good context that I didn't have.

You're right that it probably isn't spam, but I just wanted to point out that this particular poster isn't exactly kosher either. 

I said it before and I'll say it again, all the personal information was removed from the post and it was not taken off someones personal facebook by me, it was re-posted on a circ page.  Would you like to see?  She put her medically fragile baby at risk and now he is in critical condition 

https://www.facebook.com/PagansAgainstCircumcision

KylieCamp13

OP, I thought I would help you out and give you some other data. This is from the CDC. Which is probably a little bit reputable than someone's facebook post. please note the sarcasm

If you are going to present an argumentative topic, it is usually good form to give facts representing both sides. Facebook and personal opinions, of course, aren't facts. You come across as uneducated and an opinion pusher. Scare tactics will do you no service in an environment of people who are more than capable of factual research. Google Scholar would be the place to locate better sources. Vs google itself.

https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/malecircumcision/

TLCTugger

^^ Are you only here to sway people to circumcise or not circumcise? Because last time I checked, what I choose to do with my future sons foreskin is not your damn business  ^^ 

 

Wow.  Just wow.  

You must have been REALLY outraged when non-therapeutic cutting on your female child's genitals was outlawed, since that's none of anyone's business, either.