Recently my DH's brother became engaged. Since he is older they are having a short engagement and are thinking of having the wedding the first weekend in August. Obviously this is DH brother and not exactly a wedding we can skip. I will be almost 37 weeks at that point AND it's a 4 hour drive (normally we would fly, but that is out of the question) Since the date has not been set in stone yet, I have kindly asked DH to talk to his brother about our situation. Even though they plan to have a small wedding, by no means are we trying to have them center their day around us. But I do think it's something that needs to be discussed. BIL doesn't have any children and does not understand pregnancy and what being 37 weeks means! That's why I need DH to interviene. Also, we are talking Miami heat in August...not very plesant (and I am assuming wedding is outdoors)
What would you guys do? Am I over worrying about all this (I am a FTM)? Any advice is greatly appreciated
Re: Out of town wedding at 37 weeks.....help!
I definitely think this is something that your husband needs to talk to his brother about. Another thing to consider is that you could have the baby before then and your husband could potentially not be able to make it, let alone you. I'm not saying that the brother needs to plan his wedding around your pregnancy. But it is something that he should be aware of -- that neither of you might be able to make it.
I'd suck it up and go, or if the date rolls around and I really am feeling crappy, I'd just have H go.
37 weeks is still a good 3-5 weeks until you have the kid, you might be a little uncomfortable but I think you are over-worrying about it. Get a nice linen dress for that Miami heat and have fun, treat it like a last date with your H.
I agree with this. I debate whether to even propose this, since you are a FTM, but the only compromise I can think of is to have DH attend, and you stay home. This is only if there is no wiggle room on the wedding date. First pregnancies usually have pretty long labors, so if you happen to go into labor during the wedding, DH, could hop in the car immediately and be back before it's too late. But, I totally recognize that is still not ideal, and that you would probably want DH with you the entire time, and he may want that as well.
The one thing I am certain of is that I would in no way travel that far at that point in my pregnancy. Good luck to you!
IVF #1: 9/11: ER: 12R, 11M, 10F, No Frosties; 5dt: 2 blasts, 1 morula; DD born 6/3/12
IVF #2: 11/12-12/12: ER: 20R, 20M, 16F, 4 Frosties; 5dt: 3 blasts, DS born 8/9/13
Yes, this is another factor! I will mention that to DH.
I'm not one to argue on TB, but I have to say I completely feel the opposite. When we asked our OB about the wedding we went to at 36 weeks his only advice was you should either go together or not at all because you'll want to be with eachother if something were to happen. Every pregnancy is different, but when I did go into labor at 40 weeks my labor was 5.5 hours start to finish.
I kind of ignored the question about you going, because if they do decide on that date, I really think that's a decision you need to make when it gets closer. I just think it's necessary for the brother to know that it's possible your husband will miss it. I have friends who delivered between 36 and 38 weeks -- three that I can think of just off the top of my head.
TTC since 3/12
High LH/FSH Ratio 8/12
DX with PCOS 11/12
Clomid 50mg - 19.5mm Follie - Trigger + TI = BFP! 11/12
EDD August 11, 2013
Creedon- I am not asking for them to change their date becasue it's hot. I am asking for him to consider the impact it has on his brother/best friend. Since they are having suchg a small weddding anyways, wouldn't it be important that your best man be able to give 110% ?
NawlinsGirl- There is definately wiggle room with the date, that's why I think he should talk to him about it sooner than later. (It also makes me wonder why they are even considering that date...)
I agree with everything you are saying. I just want DH to help BIL understand where we will be at that point....and yes, 2 weeks would definately make a difference!
Agree with this 100%. Let his brother know the situation and they will do with it what they want. I would not want DH 4 hours away that close to my due date. DH was supposed to be the best man in a wedding 1 week before our due date and he is opting out because the wedding is 5 hours away.
FWIW, my cousin just had her first baby 4 weeks early. Not the norm, but something to consider.
This, Miami is a big city and they have LOADS of hospitals, it's not like you will be away from civilization.
Maybe you let your MIL know what's going on, because it might be easier for her to lean on them about this then for you or DH to do it directly. Just for the love of god do NOT bring up the fact that you will be really pregnant and it will be hot and uncomfortable, because that will destroy all your credibility.
Maybe you say something, like "hey, baby could arrive anytime between [tentative wedding date] and 4 weeks after that, and we won't know until closer to [tentative wedding date] whether I'll be able to travel at that point. Obviously we'll do everything we can to be there for you guys and we're SO sorry we can't commit, but we don't know whether either or both of us is going to be able to be there on [tentative wedding date]."
Because, really, this is your first pregnancy and you have no idea how things might go. You may have some (minor) complication that means it's a BFD if you try to drive 4 hours away at 37 weeks, and that you really shouldn't be home alone at 37 weeks either, because you might need to get rushed to the hospital. Placenta previa is the one that comes to mind first, because I know so many people who've had it, but I'm sure there are others.
Totally agree with this! The only thing that I would even mention in the discussion, to be honest, is that they should be aware that it's possible you and even your husband will not be there. Then they can make the decision that works best for them, end of story.
Do they even know you are pregnant yet?
I wouldn't ask them to change the date. I'd just explain that you will do your best to make it, but if something comes up with the pregnancy that you won't be able to come.
Heat and comfort aren't really the issue at all. It's generally frowned upon by OBs to travel past 36 weeks, and some set a travel cut-off earlier than that. It doesn't matter if there are hospitals around or not, it's not the hospital where you registered or where your OB will be able to deliver. Your insurance may not cover it if you travel that late and have to deliver elsewhere (which is what my OB told me when I had to go out of town at 35 weeks). There are way more serious things to consider than how hot it will be outside.
Definitely talk to your BIL about this, and I agree with PP, don't even bring up the heat and comfort level at 37 weeks.
I agree with Creedon. You may also want to familiarize yourself with what hospitals are available in that area (just in case). It'll make you feel more secure in travelling if a plan is in place for if you happen to go into labor while you are there. (And if you are having a difficult pregnancy or are high-risk, ask your doctor for a copy of your records before you go.)
2 years, 2 surgeries, 2 clomid fails, 2 IUIs, 1 loss, IVF #1 - 10/25/10 = BFP!, DS is now 3.5yrs!
TTC #2 - 6/12 surgery #3, FET #1 & 1.2 = BFN, 12/2012 FET #2 = BFP! DD is 1.5 yrs!
Surprise! 12/16/14 BFP, loss #2 12/31/14
I can't wait for the "im getting a divorce" post in 5 years or so because your husbands were fed up with your disgusting chair asses from playing on the knot all day and getting fired 4-5 times for not doing any work. you guys are all winners!! ~ Laur929
Yes.......
Yeah, not necessarily. At all actually. I went into labor with my son at 37w3d. It happens all the time. Generally, I don't think your OB is going to want you to travel at 37 weeks, but that is just my guess.
If it were me, I would tell DH to let his brother know that if they get married at that time, you guys might not make it. If it means enough to them to change it, then they will. If not, then at least you put it out there.
I was thinking this. In general my OB does not want me to travel after 37 weeks to so far way. I went to a wedding at 36 weeks and it was fine. but we were not too far from the hospital. I have a thing that I strange doctor will deliver my baby that doesn't know my medical history.
My friend had her baby aqt 35 weeks and although that is rare, there is no way to tell when baby is coming.
I probably would just explain that most likely we won't be attending the wedding , but you will see how it goes and what the doctor says. See how you feel at that point in time.
Obviously as with everything, there are exceptions. But the majority of FTMs go to full term at about 40 weeks or longer. I didn't think that need be clarified in my OP.
I'm in the same boat! Hub's best friends wedding is late July and I'm due 08/06. We're just going to take it day-by-day and when RSVP time comes around we'll give him a call and explain that there's a possibility we won't make it.
It's a 4 hour drive for us as well - and our OB already said she wants to check me out prior to going anywhere farther than an hour away that late in the pregnancy.
I think if you just take it day-by-day and see how well you're feeling much closer to the wedding. I'm sure BIL would totally understand especially if you are so far along. No need for them to work around you, I think it'll work out well even if you are unable to attend.
Link? I've read that 80% go within 2 weeks either direction, with about 40% actually going past the EDD.
2 years, 2 surgeries, 2 clomid fails, 2 IUIs, 1 loss, IVF #1 - 10/25/10 = BFP!, DS is now 3.5yrs!
TTC #2 - 6/12 surgery #3, FET #1 & 1.2 = BFN, 12/2012 FET #2 = BFP! DD is 1.5 yrs!
Surprise! 12/16/14 BFP, loss #2 12/31/14
I can't wait for the "im getting a divorce" post in 5 years or so because your husbands were fed up with your disgusting chair asses from playing on the knot all day and getting fired 4-5 times for not doing any work. you guys are all winners!! ~ Laur929
I tried looking this up (albeit briefly), and couldn't find anything to support this claim.
It's a pretty widely accepted concept, I'd like to see your link about the 80% are either early or late though.
Maybe it's just me, but no way would I be going anywhere at 37 weeks. My neighbor just had her (first) kid 3 weeks early. I also wouldn't want my husband to go either. I sent him up to his folks for 5 days after Xmas (I couldn't go), and thought it would be fine. But it ended up really bothering me to be separated from him because I was having a few minor complications and was scared, and we also had a funeral to go to. I don't like to separate the family.
Also, a 4 hour trip could easily turn longer if there was bad traffic/an accident.
Have you asked your doctor if he/she would allow you to travel then?
Sounds like if there is wiggle room in the date and your brother hasn't even talked to him yet, then this might all be a non-issue...?
Soleil, rather than dodging, can you provide a link to your claim?
Personally, I read the 80% claim here, but it's not really scientific.
However, the CDC stats in 2005 suggested that the mean gestational age for babies was 38.7 weeks. (clicky) It doesn't really support a claim of more first time mothers going over 40 weeks. Of course, it doesn't separate the two. Probably because every pregnancy is different. First, second, third, fourth, eighth...
ETA: My only point is, you shouldn't claim something as fact (or even as "widely accepted") if you don't know for sure that it is. If that's your experience, that's fine. Personally, more than half of my friends went early for their firsts. Maybe only a week or 10 days. But still early. Not late.
I vaguely remember that one. Yikes. I would probably be really mad to miss a wedding in Hawaii... until the moment the baby is born.
(meant to quote Soleil)
Since it is so widely accepted, I'm sure you won't have any trouble finding a legit website with any statistics....I sure couldn't. From the not so legit sources:
pregnology:
Your due date is an estimate, it is an average. In the chart below you can see the reality.
In week 38, 2 weeks before the due date, 2 out of 10 women will give birth.
In week 39, 1 week before the due date, 2 out of 10 women will give birth.
In week 40, the due date, 3 out of 10 women will give birth.
In week 41, 1 week after the due date, 2 out of 10 women will give birth.
(that is 40% before and 40% after)
random survey:
https://spacefem.com/pregnant/charts/duedate6.php
The average first time mom had her baby at 39W,5D. 56.1% of first time moms delivered their babies on or before their due date.
multiple other forums like the one below suggesting that the average is 40w1 day, meaning to get that average, about half the women have to before 40 weeks.
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/77608.page
2 years, 2 surgeries, 2 clomid fails, 2 IUIs, 1 loss, IVF #1 - 10/25/10 = BFP!, DS is now 3.5yrs!
TTC #2 - 6/12 surgery #3, FET #1 & 1.2 = BFN, 12/2012 FET #2 = BFP! DD is 1.5 yrs!
Surprise! 12/16/14 BFP, loss #2 12/31/14
I can't wait for the "im getting a divorce" post in 5 years or so because your husbands were fed up with your disgusting chair asses from playing on the knot all day and getting fired 4-5 times for not doing any work. you guys are all winners!! ~ Laur929