I have been a SAHM for 2 years, since DD was born. I have been messing with the idea of going back to work, but waited until we moved to seriously consider it. I had put my resume on monster and some other career sites, and got a call today from a recruiter who thinks she has a fit for me. She is sending me info on the company, position, etc. I have a really good background in project mgmt, and an engineering degree, so part of me thinks I am wasting my brain (not being offensive to sahm's) by not being in the workplace. I also often wonder what I will do in 3 years when the kids are in school all day. I mean, I can only work-out for so long in a day ![]()
So...my question is, if you could choose to work or stay home, would you work or sahm? If money was NO object. We can afford for me to sahm, but it would def help if I had a job, I would not take one that did not pay me generously enough to make it worth it.
Thoughts?
TIA!!
Re: Working moms
If money was not object, I would prefer to stay home until about your DD's age, maybe 3 and then work part time.
I've been working full time since B was 12 wks old and it sucks ass. I miss her so much.
If we could live comfortably, I'd SAH. Once the kids started school I'd work part time, so I was able to take them to school and pick them up as needed. HOWEVER, that's if money was no object.
I don't mind working, Jake loves daycare. I think he gets bored with me because he loves to be out and playing with other kids.
If money were no object I'd stay at home until my daughter started kindergarten. Then I'd work full-time again. I hate being at work all day while she's in daycare. I mean, I love working (and I was super-ready to go back after maternity leave)...I've just found that I love being w/ my daughter more.
But the grass is always greener!
If money were no object I would stay home. I would try to get a para proffessional position in the school system once dd started school just to keep busy.
I would still send dd to the sitter at least 2 days a week, though. SHe loves it there and it would give some time to do housework, grocery shopping, etc and save the quality time for her and dh.
See, my daughter LOVED her little preschool that she went to twice a week before we moved, now she is out because we have to find a new one.
She loves the interaction with kids, and I think she would love daycare. Parker has only gone tthe gym, never school or MDO, so I dunno abouto him. Ugh...decisions.
I do think I would have serious withdrawl issues from them both though. That is why I was asking for working mom's input. Thanks for being honest ladies!!
If money were no object, I would stay at home, no doubt. A little piece of me dies every day I have to leave my kid (which I love) and come to work (which I'm starting to hate), especially those rare days when he's sick or clingy.
That said, I'd have to freelance or volunteer or something, and send him to daycare or playgroup or whatever so he'd have some interaction, and so I don't go bonkers.
Ideally I would work PT, maybe 30 hours a week - unfortunately there aren't many good PT positions in my field out there. I don't mind working FT but I do feel crunched for time and it would be nice to have a few more free hours.
If I had to choose between working FT or 100% SAH I would choose to work FT. I am just not cut out to SAH, I am sure of this because after only 3 weeks on maternity leave I'm counting the days until I can go back to work. The idea of doing this indefinitely...let's just say it's not appealing to me AT ALL.