DH works in a school system. Kindergarten and first grade teachers that he knows strongly encourage parents to wait until their sons are 6 before starting kindergarten. This is because boys are no longer held back for another year of kindergarten (this was pretty common practice when I was a kid.)
Parents, however, will often send their boys at 5. Some of these boys then have problems in the first grade.
What is you plan? What is normal for where you live?
Re: What age to start kindergarten?
I am a kindergarten teacher in WI, our cut-off is 5 by 9/1. When parents ask, I give advice on a kid-by-kid basis. Usually if a parent is asking, they have doubts themselves. We mostly look at maturity, not ability. Can he/she sit and look through an entire book? Is there even a tiny interest in coloring/cutting/doing a project?
That being said, my DS has a July birthday, he was born 4.5 weeks early, is in speech therapy (not a delay, articulation only) and I'll be holding him. Currently he attends a 3 half-day/week phonology preschool class (through our school district) and I know that both phonolgy preschool and 4K this year would be TOO much for him. So he'll attend 4K when he's 5 and K when he's 6.
Even as a K teacher in our district, I was strongly encourgaed to not wait, send him at 5. BUT I know him best and I also have the insider's view to know what's expected of him in Kindergarten. Unfortunately it's no longer 'just' learning to play w/ others, learning to cooperate, learning to be at school, learning the alphabet, learning to write your name, etc. It's learning to read, write, spell, etc. I think some the expectations are too high...but that's another issue
I would make the decision on a case by case basis. My twin girls are July babies, they just started Pre-K and are the youngest in there class. They will be the youngest in Kindergarten class, but I am going to send them when they are 5. But this is mainly because they are girls and I feel they are ready. One of my very close friends had her son 3 months after my girls in early October. So he is going to be a year behind them in school and she has said this is the best thing. When she sees him and my girls interact you can really see a difference in maturity and development. He is by no means delayed, but he is just not as ready as they are for school. She said if he had been born in August, she would have been holding him back and is so happy he has 2 more years until starting Kindergarten. So in this example, for her, it would be best to hold her son if he had been born in the summer, before the cut off.
My DH is a July kid (birthday is 2 days after our girls) and he was never held back. He didn't even go to Kindergarten because they had moved to FL that summer and when his Mom went to register him the class was already full, there was no room for him. His Mom told the school that is fine, but he will be starting 1st grade the following year, she would not allow him to be redshirted and he was always one of the top students in his class.
Each kids is different and decisions should be made of that child, not a generalization of boys.
Kids here start junior kindergarten the calendar year they turn 4. So, kids born after Labour Day start as young as age 3y9m.
Most kids therefore start grade one the calendar year they turn 6.
Redshirting is very uncommon here.
DS1 started JK at 4y3m old. DS2 will start JK at 4y8m.
Same, except we don't have jk here. If your ds was in our school system, he'd be asked to start grade one. Kindergarten here is 5 as of 2/28, with "young 5s" evaluated at the end of the school year. It's rare that anyone is held back. Redshirting is very uncommon here, there aren't any benefits to it - for the reasons I've seen it done (sports, etc. sports here are by birth year and they are on their own not through the school).
I'm only a fan of redshirting if there is a clear reason to do so. I'm not comfortable with a parent making that decision arbitrarily, without an evaluation of some sort to back them up. A family member has done this, the school wasn't comfortable, and her child is a good two years older than the other kids. It's awkward to say the least - academically she's where she should be (ahead for her grade, on par for her age), socially her friends are in the next grade and some up. Her reason for holding her back? She's not as tall as the kids her age (but she never will be). That is the one and only redshirter I know.
I would not make this decision just because my child is a boy.
However, my son's birthday is -- well, it's today, actually! -- 6 days before the cutoff for Kindergarten in our state. I had to decide with both of my kids whether to wait a year or not. Complicating matters was the fact that both of my kids could read well by age 5; they were both academically ready. DD was ready in other ways as well. However, it was pretty clear that at barely 5 years old my son wasn't quite ready for real school yet. Here's how I knew:
--still wasn't independent enough yet: didn't like to do stuff on his own.
--didn't always seem to "get" what he was supposed to do in activities in preschool and needed a lot of teacher attention.
--I didn't think he was ready to find his way to the right bus in a hurry every day. I also wasn't sure he could find his way around the school.
--he just seemed younger, less mature, and less confident than the other kids in his preschool class.
If my child was only 5 but seemed "with it" enough to hang with kids 6 months to a year older, and independent enough to manage kindergarten, I would not hold that child in preschool for another year "just because."
We just moved to this town but from talking to a few people and the teachers at open house redshirting is not that common unless the child's birthday is very close to the cutoff date which is Sept 30.
DD's birthday is Sept 26 and we are waiting to see how she does in prek before we make a decision. I think she will be ready but we have not made a definite decision yet.
The idea that kids are being pushed to be held back actually pisses me off because the parents of the kids that send the kids, oh because the district cut off dates should be the cut off date, wind up with kids that just turned 5 in with kids that might be 6 1/2 which is insane to me. I find it lazy teaching to give a blanket statement that you have a son so wait a year.
To me, go by your kid. But people have to be careful because if there is a problem then you lose a year of help the child could have gotten, hard to tell immaturity versus real issue.
And my school district holds kids back, if it is a maturity issue they will also do a transitional 1st grade.
Our state just changed the cutoff date from Dec. 1st to Sep. 1st , but will do it gradually... so next school year (not the one that starts next month), will be Nov. 1st, the following year Oct. 1 and then September 1.
My ds is a late Oct. baby, so he will be eligible for kindergarten as a 4 year old. Barring any sudden behavioral issues, he'll be going. I think if we are worried about it, he can attend an Early 5s program, but based on what his preschool teachers are saying, he will be fine in regular class. He's smart and well-behaved at school (now home is another story).
My dd will miss the cutoff by 8 days, so even though they are only 2 years apart, they will be 4 grades apart when she starts school.
Our state just changed the cutoff date from Dec. 1st to Sep. 1st , but will do it gradually... so next school year (not the one that starts next month), will be Nov. 1st, the following year Oct. 1 and then September 1.
My ds is a late Oct. baby, so he will be eligible for kindergarten as a 4 year old. Barring any sudden behavioral issues, he'll be going. I think if we are worried about it, he can attend an Early 5s program, but based on what his preschool teachers are saying, he will be fine in regular class. He's smart and well-behaved at school (now home is another story).
My dd will miss the cutoff by 8 days, so even though they are only 2 years apart, they will be 3 grades apart when she starts school.
I don't have a son, but my daughter will be 5 years and about 1 week when she starts K. I have absolutely no doubt she's ready and I see no reason to hold her back. In fact, I think waiting a year would be detrimental for her. I'm not in love with the redshirting trend because in many ways it punishes lower income families (can't afford another year of daycare or SAHP, but now they're being pushed because everyone else is doing it and their kid seems immature when they really aren't, they're average). I have yet to meet a boy who turned 5 after April of this year who is starting K and I think it's absurd. Yes, there are a few who truly aren't ready, but most I get the sense aren't going because their parents are following the crowd and everyone else is holding back.
I love that in NYC you can't redshirt. If you register a kid whose birthday leaves them eligible for 1st grade in K they are automatically bumped to 1st and miss K since it's not compulsory. And the cutoff there is late, like Dec 31. So many 4.5 year olds are in K there.
Despite a late April birthday, DS is rather socially immature, so we're going to go with whatever his preschool teacher recommends to us come registration time in March. She's a former kindergarten teacher, so she has a good idea of what's expected.
DD will be almost 6 when she starts.
I actually know more than a few people that are sending their kids to private kindergarten and then testing in to first grade b/c their kids just miss the cutoff and are ready to start school. So, that's interesting, considering the redshirting trend.
I think there does need to be more in place than just mom and dad making a decision to hold back, some sort of readiness testing but being academically ready vs socially ready are 2 very different things and both are very important and not really sure how to test for all of that.
As it is, DS1 is super bright - and big - so I can't imagine him waiting an extra year to start kindergarten.
eta - He's also a very social kid.
My Blog



