Parenting

Re: Catelynn is pregnant!

  • imagedangerkitty102:

    why is this link so long?

    This made me LOL.  Still giggling.

    I really hoped she and Tyler had learned their lesson!  Oh well.  Hopefully, things will work out for them.

  • Yeah I would have liked to have seen them graduate college, get real jobs and get married first. Hopefully they are making a decent living being adoption advocates with all their public speaking. And you know, their MTV money.
    image > Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • Loading the player...
  • Huh?

    She was hurting so much that it's not surprising she wanted a baby to keep. 

    Those two (from what I can tell) seem to have a good relationship-- they made it through the hardest of trials at such a young age.

    But I don't think they'll do much with their future plans.

     

    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
  • imageHeather R:

    Huh?

    She was hurting so much that it's not surprising she wanted a baby to keep. 

    Those two (from what I can tell) seem to have a good relationship-- they made it through the hardest of trials at such a young age.

    But I don't think they'll do much with their future plans.

     

    This.   


    image
    C is 3 years old

  • imageturkyinthecar:

    Hey AE!  It would have been funnier if you had made a new AE called Catelynsute.  For future reference.

  • I didn't think I'd be happy to hear a "teen mom" was pregnant. Then again I didn't see her getting pregnant again anytime soon.

    She is one of the most grown up of the group (she and Maci are the most adult). I agree she's still going through serious emotional issues around Carlee(sp?)'s adoption. I think a lot of it has to do with the fact that her mother said such horrible things about giving her up. Catelynn gave her up because she loved her enough to know at that time she couldn't give her little girl what she needed. 

    ETA: Meh if she's not so be it. I still think she's one of the most adult of the group and would be the most prepared for a baby this time around.

    BFP #1 10/28/09 EDD 06/24/10- Miscarriage 11/2/09
    BFP #2 11/30/09 EDD 08/12/10- Sophia Grace born 8/1/10
    BFP #3 11/16/10 EDD 08/04/11- Samuel Richard born 7/28/11
    BFP #4 01/04/12 EDD 09/19/12- Simon Nathaniel born 9/6/12
    BFP #5 03/27/13 EDD 11/25/13- Savannah Lee born 11/18/13
  • imagewonkatalia:
    imageturkyinthecar:

    Hey AE!  It would have been funnier if you had made a new AE called Catelynsute.  For future reference.

    Ha!

     

    Wait.  In Touch says she is.  US Magazine says she isn't.  

    Seems like Wenner Media and Bauer Publishing decided they needed to boost sales! 

  • Why do they look so much alike? I can't take it.
    sam & arlo 

  • Well if they are expecting I wish them the best.  I dont think very much of the grandparents, and admire them for their sacrifice.
    imageimageLilypie - Personal pictureLilypie Angel and Memorial tickers BFP 6/12/11, MMC@ around 9wks, D&C 8/23/11 at 12wks BFP#2 Jan 2012 CP 1/19/12 **Miss you baby*** PGAL/PAL Very Welcome For I know the plans I have for you,
  • Whew! I'm relieved that she isn't!

    But hey, you don't have to be hostile - I'm just sharing news from legitimate news sources. In Touch is legit right? lol

    image > Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • imagedangerkitty102:

    Whew! I'm relieved that she isn't!

    But hey, you don't have to be hostile - I'm just sharing news from legitimate news sources. In Touch is legit right? lol

    Well... she actually might be. This is actually something pretty common that these magazines do when they get scooped by their competition. They'll run a conflicting story. So they find out that their competition got a story out before they could, so they run a story saying the opposite. Then a few weeks later they run a story saying that their sources have now confirmed that things have changed in the last few weeks and the story is now accurate. They try to make it look like they got the scoop and their competition just jumped the gun. So who knows. Maybe she is, maybe she isn't. But the fact that the magazines are in conflict could mean something other than the first magazine being wrong. 

  • imagejudahsmommy1:
    imagedangerkitty102:

    Whew! I'm relieved that she isn't!

    But hey, you don't have to be hostile - I'm just sharing news from legitimate news sources. In Touch is legit right? lol

    Well... she actually might be. This is actually something pretty common that these magazines do when they get scooped by their competition. They'll run a conflicting story. So they find out that their competition got a story out before they could, so they run a story saying the opposite. Then a few weeks later they run a story saying that their sources have now confirmed that things have changed in the last few weeks and the story is now accurate. They try to make it look like they got the scoop and their competition just jumped the gun. So who knows. Maybe she is, maybe she isn't. But the fact that the magazines are in conflict could mean something other than the first magazine being wrong. 

    interesting! 

    image > Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • imagedangerkitty102:
    imagejudahsmommy1:
    imagedangerkitty102:

    Whew! I'm relieved that she isn't!

    But hey, you don't have to be hostile - I'm just sharing news from legitimate news sources. In Touch is legit right? lol

    Well... she actually might be. This is actually something pretty common that these magazines do when they get scooped by their competition. They'll run a conflicting story. So they find out that their competition got a story out before they could, so they run a story saying the opposite. Then a few weeks later they run a story saying that their sources have now confirmed that things have changed in the last few weeks and the story is now accurate. They try to make it look like they got the scoop and their competition just jumped the gun. So who knows. Maybe she is, maybe she isn't. But the fact that the magazines are in conflict could mean something other than the first magazine being wrong. 

    interesting! 

    And by the time the baby's born nobody remembers who got the scoop.

    Seriously.

     

     

  • ppantsppants member
    IMO In Touch isn't very reliable UNLESS they have an exculsive interview.  It's the mag that has Jen Aniston on the cover every other week saying she's KU.  I read US Weekly (I know..I know) and they are usually correct in their reporting.
    Wendy Twins 1/27/06. DS and DD
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"