I think H and I may be lame

beeunit

We have our names picked out for baby #2.  Well, a girl name for sure.  DS1 is Aaron.  The name we have for a girl is Annabelle.  I really don't want to be the person that follows the same letter for each child, but here I am.  And H apparently wants to be that person because every name he comes up with for a boy starts with an "A".  I told him that wasn't a necessity, but he thinks it is.  Oh boy.

getitdone

I personally don't think it is lame. BUT if you have a 3rd - stick with the name thing. My siblings both had the same initials RFS - mine was AS - I didn't even get a middle name.

MamaJovie

getitdone:

BUT if you have a 3rd - stick with the name thing.

I disagree with this.

IMO, two is a coincidence, three is a theme.

So, name your baby whatever you'd like to this time, but once you have two As, I'd steer clear for number three. 

getitdone

MamaJovie:

getitdone:

BUT if you have a 3rd - stick with the name thing.

I disagree with this.

IMO, two is a coincidence, three is a theme.

So, name your baby whatever you'd like to this time, but once you have two As, I'd steer clear for number three. 

I can tell you from experience it leaves the third feeling left out.

cll915

I don't think that is lame at all. Our first girl will be Gillian Annabelle and our first boy would be Garrett Michael.

MamaJovie

getitdone:

I can tell you from experience it leaves the third feeling left out.

To each her own. 

beeunit

cll915:

I don't think that is lame at all. Our first girl will be Gillian Annabelle and our first boy would be Garrett Michael.

Oh good!  Love the middle name :-)

beeunit

MamaJovie:

getitdone:

BUT if you have a 3rd - stick with the name thing.

I disagree with this.

IMO, two is a coincidence, three is a theme.

So, name your baby whatever you'd like to this time, but once you have two As, I'd steer clear for number three. 

Ahh, I see both sides to this argument, actually.  I think we're done at 2, so hopefully this isn't an issue.

TinyTRex321

MamaJovie:

getitdone:

BUT if you have a 3rd - stick with the name thing.

I disagree with this.

IMO, two is a coincidence, three is a theme.

So, name your baby whatever you'd like to this time, but once you have two As, I'd steer clear for number three. 

I agree with this unless a theme is what you are going for. I was talking to my sister about this recently b/c my brother and I are J's and my sister is a K, she never felt left out. Also she named her first 2 Alex and Annabel and her 3rd Eliza. 

JBM1204

getitdone:

MamaJovie:

getitdone:

BUT if you have a 3rd - stick with the name thing.

I disagree with this.

IMO, two is a coincidence, three is a theme.

So, name your baby whatever you'd like to this time, but once you have two As, I'd steer clear for number three. 

I can tell you from experience it leaves the third feeling left out.

I disagree. My older sister and I are both J names out of coincidence and my younger sister is an A name. Not only does she not feel left out, I think she likes having a different initial. 

m21megs

getitdone:

MamaJovie:

getitdone:

BUT if you have a 3rd - stick with the name thing.

I disagree with this.

IMO, two is a coincidence, three is a theme.

So, name your baby whatever you'd like to this time, but once you have two As, I'd steer clear for number three. 

I can tell you from experience it leaves the third feeling left out.

I don't think it matters if people see a "theme" or not. If u like the name... Go with it!:)