My scan is scheduled for Thursday, and I am starting to rethink it. My doctor recommended it so I agreed, and at the time my thoughts were "It is non-invasive and another chance to check on baby". But if something did come up abnormal...dh and I would deny any further testing (because of the risk of miscarriage and our unwillingness to abort). Which makes me wonder why I am getting one...I really want the reassurance that everything is okay, but if it comes back that there might be something wrong, the stress of that would be so much for me.
What are your thoughts? My sister, a pediatrician, really wants me to get it. I'm only 27 so the possibility is very low, but still. Ugh. Decisions decisions...
Re: Second Thoughts about NT scan...
I'm 29 and I'm getting an NT in a couple of weeks. For me, it's more so because my DH is older. But that's about as "invasive" as I want to get. I just need to be prepared if anything might be wrong so we can be better prepared for it. Either way I would stress myself out, if I knew or if I didn't know, so I elect to know.
Think about it and do some more research. I hope it helps you to come to a better decision.
Army Girl, been in since Feb 2003 married to an Army Man, in since 1990.
I think we will probably not opt to do the NT scan. I think the information you receive from it is not that helpful either. My SIL did the test with her first baby because the doctor really encouraged her. They called her to say she was at high risk for down syndrome. She was a wreck. Then they called two days later to say that they made a mistake and miscalcuted how far along she was and that her risk was actually pretty low. My SIL says she knows at least 5 other friends who were given incorrect results and made them worry unnecessarily.
It's usually recommended for women who are 34+ or who have a history of problems in their family.
Make a pregnancy ticker
The results aren't false, but they also aren't terribly helpful if you aren't continuing with testing. For example, a 1 in 17 risk for Down's Syndrome would be considered elevated risk (and it's quite a bit higher than the rest of the population), but even with that high risk, there's still a 94% chance of having a perfectly healthy baby.
We skipped it last time and we're skipping it this time. Just too much ambiguity if you don't plan on doing more invasive testing.
~Working Mom~Breastfeeding Mom~Cloth Diapering Mom~BLW Mom~
Blog - No Longer on the DL ~ The Man Cave
Shawn and Larissa
LO #1 - Took 2 years and 2 IVFs ~ DX - severe MFI mild PCOS homozygous MTHFR (a1298c)
LO #2 - TTC 7 months, surprise spontaneous BFP!
Sometimes, a screening test can suggest that a normal baby has a high risk of having Down's syndrome. This is called a false positive. The false positive rate for an NT scan is 5%.
this, exactly.
DS born via unplanned C-section at 40w6d
This is a really personal decision and you really need to think about what you want to do...no one else can make that decision for you.
Personally, we skipped it with DD and skipped it with this baby too. We didn't want to worry unnecessarily and we wouldn't have done any further testing anyway.
All that said, I would never tell someone they should/shouldn't. It's a personal decision, and it's not my place to tell anyone what to do. Having/not having doesn't do any harm so to each their own.