I dont think my doc counts anything over 36 weeks as a preemie, especially since they will schedule someone to be induced after 37 weeks based on baby being big and have no issues with it.
"We like nothing better than buffing our Zygoma. And imagining a horny time traveling long overcoat purple scarf wearing super sleuth nordic legend fuck fantasy. Get to work on that, internet." Benedict Cumberbatch
The preemie moms can correct me if I'm wrong, but there are 2 terms I believe. Pre-term and Pre-mature. Pre-term is before 37 weeks and pre-mature is under 5.5lbs or somewhere around there.
My DD was born at 38w6d at 6lbs2oz and was full term and not pre-mature (and obviously smaller than the baby noted above)
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
And interestingly
enough, I get comments like this from people all the time. When I tell
someone that Sophie was born at 38 weeks and was 5 lbs, 15 oz, they say,
"Oh, so she was a preemie, then?" I guess there are a lot of people that don't have an understanding of what it means.
No. Most doctors consider 37 weeks full term. There is always a chance that the mom had her dates wrong. Being a preemie is defined by gestational age, not weight.
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
The preemie moms can correct me if I'm wrong, but there are 2 terms I believe. Pre-term and Pre-mature. Pre-term is before 37 weeks and pre-mature is under 5.5lbs or somewhere around there.
My DD was born at 38w6d at 6lbs2oz and was full term and not pre-mature (and obviously smaller than the baby noted above)
This is correct. If you are born before 37 weeks you are a preemie, after and you are term. There are other classes of preemies such as late term or micro, but I won't get into that.
The woman's grandchild is niether a preemie nor pre-mature, just on the smaller side of average.
I didn't think it was a premature baby either. The way she keeps talking about it though makes me think she just wants attention. (She is that kind of person anyway.)
No. Most doctors consider 37 weeks full term. There is always a chance that the mom had her dates wrong. Being a preemie is defined by gestational age, not weight.
37 weeks is full-term. I have two 34-weekers who have been referred to as "late pre-term births". They are technically preemies, but not in the same sense as babies born 32 weeks or earlier.
There is actually some research going on now for "late pre-term babies" to investigate breathing and sleeping patterns, plus some blood research to determine possible causes of late pre-term labor.
Some of the confusion comes with the March of Dimes wording that term is upon the completion of 37 weeks (so as far as they are concerned 37 and 5/7 would not be considered term) but most doctors consider 37 weeks even term.
At my hospital, the nurses and doctors considered any baby born before 37w7d a premie. Their full term was stressed in their classes as 37 and 7. There was no exception. I guess it really depends on your hospital and doctor.
I might be wrong, but I believe anything before 38 weeks is pre-term (38wks is term) and anything under 6lbs is pre-mature. In other words, a baby who was born at 5 1/2lbs at 40 weeks could still be considered premature, and a baby born at 36 weeks who was 7 lbs would be pre-term but not premature. Does that make sense?
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
My DS was born at 36w2d and the doctor didn't even call him pre-term. I asked, and she was like, no, he's full term. So obviously there is a lot of variation on this. FWIW he was 6pds 11oz although I don't think that should play a role in it in terms of early/lateness.
Re: Is this baby considered a premie?
"We like nothing better than buffing our Zygoma. And imagining a horny time traveling long overcoat purple scarf wearing super sleuth nordic legend fuck fantasy. Get to work on that, internet." Benedict Cumberbatch
<a href
The preemie moms can correct me if I'm wrong, but there are 2 terms I believe. Pre-term and Pre-mature. Pre-term is before 37 weeks and pre-mature is under 5.5lbs or somewhere around there.
My DD was born at 38w6d at 6lbs2oz and was full term and not pre-mature (and obviously smaller than the baby noted above)
I always thought 37 weeks was considered term. I don't know, maybe I'm wrong.
No. 37 weeks is considered full term.
And interestingly enough, I get comments like this from people all the time. When I tell someone that Sophie was born at 38 weeks and was 5 lbs, 15 oz, they say, "Oh, so she was a preemie, then?" I guess there are a lot of people that don't have an understanding of what it means.No. Most doctors consider 37 weeks full term. There is always a chance that the mom had her dates wrong. Being a preemie is defined by gestational age, not weight.
This is correct. If you are born before 37 weeks you are a preemie, after and you are term. There are other classes of preemies such as late term or micro, but I won't get into that.
The woman's grandchild is niether a preemie nor pre-mature, just on the smaller side of average.
I kind of thought this too.
37 weeks is full-term. I have two 34-weekers who have been referred to as "late pre-term births". They are technically preemies, but not in the same sense as babies born 32 weeks or earlier.
There is actually some research going on now for "late pre-term babies" to investigate breathing and sleeping patterns, plus some blood research to determine possible causes of late pre-term labor.