I have a tough choice to make and would love your input. Here's my pros and cons list based on the particular midwife and OB that I have met and will choose between. We will be doing a hospital birth no matter what.
Midwife
|
Pros |
Cons |
|
Long appointments/ask anything |
Must leave hospital after 3 hours |
|
Natural birth |
Epidural only if 100% desperate, and then transfer of care to hospital staff if I get one |
|
Supportive atmosphere (other moms, group sessions, library, etc) |
Too granola for us? |
|
More experienced in normal births than a doctor |
Not a doctor, chance would have to transfer care due to pregnancy or labour complication |
|
Delivery by midwife or partner |
Only 1% of their births occur at the hospital ? perhaps a little less comfortable in that surrounding. |
OB
|
Pros |
Cons |
|
Doctor, no need to ever transfer care |
Less experience in normal births |
|
Can easily cave and get epidural |
Can easily cave and get epidural |
|
Pro natural birth (compared to the average OB) |
Shorter appointments |
|
Full-on admittance to hospital and more time to stay post-birth if wanted |
Longer waiting times, postponed appointments due to deliveries |
|
|
Won?t be delivery doctor if labour on weekend |
|
|
At mercy of nurses (potential of bad ones) |
Re: Midwife vs OB - WWYD?
I love your pros and cons list! I make these all the time
Unless you have some reason to believe you're likely to become high risk, I would definitely go with the midwife. My reasons: longer/higher quality prenatal appointments, more supportive environment, knowing who will deliver your baby, and less likely to "cave" and get an epidural.
FWIW, I had all my prenatal care with MWs then transferred to an OB at 37 weeks because LO was breech. If I had it to do over knowing how it would end, I would still have gone with the midwives without a second thought. Don't underestimate the importance of those prenatal appointments.
I'd choose the midwife, personally. You have a much higher potential for great "continuity of care," meaning you'll have the same person for prenatals as the one who attends your birth. That's a big one for me.
Even if you ended up having to transfer care late in pregnancy or transport to a hospital during the birth, you're really no worse off than the situation in which you've been seeing one OB all along for (short) prenatals and then you have a different one on call when you deliver. Rather, you're probably better off for having under your belt the longer prenatals with a more attentive care provider who is knowledgeable in normal pg and birth. So to me those "cons" on the midwive con list relating to potential for transferring care are less weighty than some of the cons on the OB list.
I wouldn't think of must leave hospital after three hours as a con. I hated having to stay at the hospital with my first, I didn't get any rest and it wasn't comfortable, with my second I was home 5 hours after birth and it was so much better for me. I stayed in bed resting mostly for a few days, and DH brought me food and stuff, but it was so much more comfortable and I was able to rest much better in my own bed.
I've done both, hospital birth with an OB and birth center birth with a midwife. Midwife wins hands down. The con of being at the mercy of the nurses is a HUGE con, they can really make or break your entire stay at the hospital. They made my entire stay miserable and I don't think it was on purpose, just that I didn't fit into their usual patient catergory of epidural, push baby out, send baby to nursery several times for things so they didn't know what to do with me and it made my stay miserable.
Exactly this.
Leaving early was a definite pro for us! Even with the first one, we were so sick of all of the constant interruptions, taking of vitals, etc. and we just wanted to get home to our own comfortable bed.
I also agree about the nurses. I had a terrible nurse at first during my hospital birth and I truly believe that was why my labor "stalled" until shift change and we got a better one...
I love making lists too
I would say it depends on how badly you want to go med-free. Also, I switched from an OB to a MW at 20 weeks and never regretted my decision. I loved my MW (though my OB was nice, don't get me wrong) and loved having long appointments. I got hugs after appointments and having my MWs know details about me, it was so personal and comfortable to me. That said, i did have to transfer to hospital after birth for some light bleeding and other issues. It really sucked having to transfer but I have to tell myself I was just an unlucky gal that day. The rate of transfer is less than 10% and I am sure we'll go back to the birth center for our next birth, even with that transfer in my history.
Hope that helps.
Loss #6 2014 Loss #7 (chemical) 2014
~DS Born! 2009~
~DD Born! 2013~
Thank you so so much everyone. Your feedback is really valuable to me.
I forgot another big MW pro: In-home postpartum care.
How badly do I want to go med-free? That's the big question. When I first got pregnant I assumed I would get an epi, cause that's really all I knew. When I found out I got into the MW program (which is a miracle given the waiting lists in my area), it actually came as a surprise to me that they only did natural births. Now that I'm educating myself about natural births it certainly seems like something I want to do, but am I 100% convinced I can do it? Not yet.
Oscar born October 2011
Miscarriage at 8 weeks (August 2013)
DD due September 1, 2014
I don't know. I wouldn't want to leave the hospital after only three hours, but I'm biased because Natalie's seizures didn't get diagnosed as seizures until the next day. I sure as heck never recognized her movements as seizures.
eta: I felt fine after delivery (for the last two) and would have been fine leaving the hospital for myself.
That is what in-home postpartum care is for
It's not like the midwives cut you loose after 3 hours and never see your baby again...
I'd go with the midwives, personally, as long as you are committed to avoiding the epi!
Mommy to DD1 (June 2007), DS (January 2010), DD2 (July 2012), and The Next One (EDD 3/31/2015)
Yeah, I thought of that. But, I do wonder if a midwife would have been able to recognize seizures as seizures. They were very odd and as it was it took a few doctors and nurses to diagnose. She also did not have a recognizably traumatic birth either. That situation is completely different, though. With Dominic, I easily could have left the hospital without a care in world within a few hours:)
OP: Do what you are comfortable with. It entirely depends on these particular caregivers. My dr.'s were very natural-friendly. I don't think my experiences are typical.
I am going to go off on a tangent here...I see the twinkle of confidence in that statement and I wanted to say that I'm proud of you! So many women don't stop to wonder if they can do it, they just assume they can't (for whatever reason...society, family pressure, fear of pain). So, yay! Keep doing your research, asking tons of questions, considering your options...etc. I had a friend once say to me that she KNEW she could do it, it was a matter of whether or not she wanted to. But after all the reading and reserach she decided (and these were her words) that "a few hours of pain/discomfort that I've preppared for far outweigh the potential side effects of augmentation". GL!
Thanks. There is indeed a twinkle of confidence there. Honestly, I'm a very confident woman and I'm always up for a challenge. I had a friend say to me that if anyone she knows could do this, it's me. That excites me! But there's such a great fear of the unknown.... I've lived a pretty charmed life and have never really experienced serious physical or emotional pain. I know I could do it... I just don't know if I want to (like your friend said).
I am very much leaning towards the midwife option. As great as the OB was, I just really love the idea of going to a midwife, and I think the pros outweigh the cons. DH is supportive of either option, though he (and our parents, not that it matters cause it's our decision) would rather go the OB route.
Oscar born October 2011
Miscarriage at 8 weeks (August 2013)
DD due September 1, 2014
i'd pick a midwife for sure. if we didn't have one, i can't say i would have had a natural birth!
www.mommieswithoutmommies.com
::comes in chanting::
Midwife! Midwife! Midwife!
Midwife all the way...
We're planning a homebirth with a Certified Nurse Midwife. I am so excited!
I pushed for 3 hours.
According to my doula, if we didn't have such an awesome midwife, I probably would have had a c-section or at least episiotomy. Thanks to her, I had neither!
I went to a practice where they had both midwifes and OBs. I disliked the one OB I met with for my prenatals. All the MWs were great.
Off to the beach
DS 7/18/2010
Handy 2.0 Due Early August
2011/2012 Races
12/17/2011 Christmas Caper 10K
2/11/2012 Have a Heart 5K
3/17/2012 DC RNR Half Marathon
4/22/2012 10M Parkway Classic
10/28/2012 Marine Corps Marathon
Midwife all the way! I switched to a midwife for my section PG before I knew I was having twins. SHe had an in-house OB to back her up and I also saw a perinatologist to keep watch on the twins' health.
If I didn't have a midwife, there was no way I'd have been able to avoid a C-section. (And I didn't need one).
I felt like a piece of cattle being herded in and out of my old OBs office.The hospital was not natural friendly in the least. The midwife and her staff plus the natural friendly hospital were just amazing. It was like night and day. I can't wait to go back.
Thanks, everyone.
It certainly is unanimous on this board! I just wish the OB we met would have been cold and mean, then my decision would be so much easier!
Oscar born October 2011
Miscarriage at 8 weeks (August 2013)
DD due September 1, 2014