A childless couple who are friends of DH and I are throwing a Super Bowl party. The invite read "Grab a sitter for the kids....". Now I have never heard of a Super Bowl party that kids can't come to (it's not super late here like it is on the E Coast), so I replied that we weren't going to be able to make it. She then replied "Oh no, why? We haven't seen you in so long". Now do I do the polite thing and respond with "We have already RSVP'd to another party", or say what is really on my mind "I see no reason to hire a sitter to watch a nationally televised football game "? I understand the latter seem a little hostile, but really? A sitter for a Super Bowl party at someone's house? I am used to going to parties where there are tons of kids.
Re: Adult Only SuperBowl Party Invite WWYD
It's really not that big of a deal. They want an adult only party. If you don't want to get a sitter than say so, you don't need to make up an excuse. You just don't go then. It's up to the hosts what kind of party they want.
I can see them not wanting toddlers and such running around their house if they don't have kids, but a baby is a bit of a different story.
I'd reply that all your regular sitters are going to parties themselves, so you won't be able to make it. It's closer to the truth
BLOG: The Quinntessential Mommy
I would say that you would just like to spend LO's first Super bowl party as a family since it is his first.
My parents used to have SB parties every year and there were ALWAYS kids there. It made it more fun!
DS - 5/2010
DD - 6-2013
TTC #3 - Cycle #9
If they want an adult only party then that is fine. They probably just want all of their guests to have a nice evening out away from their kids.
If you do not want to get a sitter, then just tell her.
Bar tab = $156,000, Bus to Foxwoods = $0, Puking in the Stanley Cup = Priceless
Dude. Just be honest and say you can't get a sitter (can't or won't, I don't think it really matters).
I don't understand all these roundabout answers.
And yes, they're the ones hosting the party - so they get to decide who to invite and what type of party they want. If it doesn't work for you/your family, then just don't go.
Cam 6.6.10 - Autism, Global Developmental Delay, Mixed Receptive/Expressive Communication Disorder
I've been to plenty of SB parties that didnt' have kids there. Just because your "used to" going to parties w/ kids doesn't mean that every party from here on out will have kids.
They dont' want kids there. Get a sitter and go or don't get one and don't go. But RESPECT their choice.
Don't be "that mom" who can't go anywhere w/o her precious little angel.
And for the record, I've been invited to a party too that my friend say "no kids". I'm FINE w/ that. I actually welcome the opportunity to get out and have a little adult time.
~Benjamin Franklin
DS dx with celiac disease 5/28/10
I don't know why some of the pps seem like you are making a big deal out of this. You are entitled to your feelings. And pps, she already kindly rsvp'd no and the host is putting her on the spot and asking why.
I do agree with the pps that they are entitled to have their party without kids for whatever reason they want. Before I had kids my house was not kid-proof and parties with children was a little stressful and certainly less rowdy & fun. But you are entitled to your thoughts and say no to hiring a sitter for a SB party.
I would tell your friend that SB Sunday doesn't work for you, but you would love to get together soon- maybe invite her over for dinner and give a few dates?
Sorry, but it doesn't matter what you are used to. It is their house. Maybe they never go to Super Bowl parties where there are kids and they can't imagine having a party with kids there. It really isn't your place to say if they should have kids there or not.
You really can't go to a party if your kid isn't invited? If you can't or don't want to get a sitter, that's fine, but then you don't go to the party and it should be NBD either way. What they are asking is not unreasonable at all.
Why would you be a biitch to a friend?
We have a child and will still have childless parties.
If you want to go, get a sitter. If you don't want to leave the baby, just tell her.
I think Bride2B was the only one who really understood what I was getting at. I had already RSVP'd no and she wanted to know why. Basically the question was do I tell her the real reason why, because it I know that is sounds bitchy, I even said it was hostile.
I know that they are entitled to have their own party however they see fit, and I wasnt asking if I should try to get her to change her party for me. I have just never heard of a Super Bowl party with no kids, apparently,now I know that it is common in a lot of circles. Thank you all for your answers.
Just be honest. You don't want to hire a sitter. It's not like your reason is offensive.
And honestly, superbowl is a reason for many to get drunk, yell at the TV, and have a good time. It's not really a kid environment. Would you take your kid to a bar to watch the superbowl? Just because it's a house doesn't mean that it's going to be a tea party environment.
I don't think they will be offended or blame you really. But I bet if they find out you lied they may be.