I am curious. I have seen on the boards that many don't like to have internals. Is it a medical reason...or because they hurt? or is it because it is sort of not needed because you are going to go into labor when you do...regardless of how dilated or effaced you are? I am curious that maybe I should know something that I don't about them. TIA
DD (8/12/09), DD (2/8/11)
BFP 12/16/14| EDD 8/19/15 |MMC 1/15/15 (9 weeks 1 day)
Re: why do people refuse internals?
My #1 reason is that they truly tell you nothing - I was 1cm for weeks with DS, then 2 cm for weeks - I still went a week over due. I got excited and got my hopes up for nothing. I'd rather avoid that this time around.
#2 - increased risk of infection
#3 - sometimes they hurt
DD - February 2011
They hurt and it can sometimes cause spotting or bleeding. Thankfully, I have a permanently reinforced cervix so no internals for me! Whoo-hoo!
Plus, it can potentially introduce bacteria which many women are justifiably leery about.
Twin boys born too early at 17w4d and 18w2d in February 2010
Transabdominal cerclage placed September 2010
DS born at 35w1d in February 2011
Twin girls born at exactly 36w in February 2013
Adventures with Amelia
I'm not doing them with this pregnancy. I did them in the past and found them to not only be painful, but to be a really poor indicator of what is actually going on. They either give me false hope that labor is imminent (but then I end up going for three more weeks) or tell me that I will be pregnant for a while longer (and then go into labor two days later). Plus, the more I read about how they increase the chance of infection it just doesn't seem like a good idea.
My reasons are:
I don't need to know my progress (it will only cause me to overthink when everything should happen - I was told "any day now" for 2 weeks with DD)
I already have GBS and do not want any other increased risk of infection. I probably will refuse any checks until I'm in active labor.
For all the reasons the other posters have said!
My first internal will be when I arrive at L&D contracting every 2-3 minutes in very active labor!
My practice doesn't even do them until you go into labor or make it to your 40 week appointment - whichever comes first. The docs don't do them for all the reasons above (basically means nothing, painful/uncomfortable, risk of infection).
So I don't have to refuse, but given the option I would. Honest, if having someone stick there hand up there isn't absolutely necessary, I'm not interested.
Anytime someone sticks there hand up there they can potentially introduce bacteria. They don't give you any actual information, unless you are in active labor and trying to time an epi and when to push. You can be slightly dilated for weeks before actual labor starts. And they just don't feel good.
I don't see the point in the pain and possible bacteria when it doesn't really give me any useful information.
LO#1 - 19 cycles, 3 IUIs, 1 m/c, gonal-f, ganirelix, ovidrel, progesterone
Totally worth the wait!
Getting ready for #2
Back on Met, PCOS diet, prepping for treatments 1/12
Good luck to the wonderful ladies of 3T
Always cheering on my girls Gymnst1013 & MrsJohns
My Chart / Info for Newbies
By lilenatalem at 2012-01-28