Infertility

Article re: single embryo v. two embryo at transfer

TTC since September 2007 Dx - Unexplained 4 Clomid cycles all BFNs clomid/hcg/IUI#1 - #6 BFN IVF #1 cancelled due to slight OHSS IVF #2 BFP 3/24!! C/P Clinical Trials start May 2012 IUI#1 - BFN IUI#2 - BFN IUI#3 -

Re: Article re: single embryo v. two embryo at transfer

  • Interesting article, thank you for sharing, I have been wrestling with whether to do a single vs double embryo transfer.
    Image and video hosting by TinyPicImage and video hosting by TinyPicImage and video hosting by TinyPic
    Lilypie First Birthday tickers
    My Blog
    TTC since 4/09 - Dx PCOS 1/10, HSG: All Clear
    4 Failed Clomid cycles of varying degrees
    Clomid + Bravelle + Trigger + IUI = BFP!!
    Ectopic M/C 9/16/10 ~ Forever in our hearts <3<BR> IVF using Donor Eggs (DE) 6/11
    BCP+Lupron+Estrogen+DE ET+PIO = BFP!!!
    Beta #1: 507 #2: 1561 #3: 4,472 #4: 11,172

    BFPBs Sul06, MrsW722 & SnowflakeBride06
    GL to Mari2003 and all of the rest of the 3T Ladies
    :) SAIFW :)
  • I don't put much faith in those studies. I've transferred 1 and I've transferred 2 and I've got no baby.
    Forty-something TTC since 12/2007 3 failed IVFs DE cycle #1: BFP then D&E at 12 weeks due to neural tube defect DE cycle #2: Chemical FET #1: BFN Lining issues, pursuing adoption
  • Loading the player...
  • Interesting article, but even after reading that I still wouldn't have done a SET.  There is an assumption, which I think is lofty and idealistic, that people can afford to do two IVFs to end up with similar success rates to one IVF with a two embryo transfer.  If we had better health coverage in this country which manadated IF coverage then I would be fine doing a SET, but honestly I think it is completely unrealistic to make the assumption that everyone can afford two IVFs.  The real stats are that most IF patients will never be able to afford one IVF let alone two. 

    I think the most realistic statements of this entire article were in the last paragraph where they touch briefly on the financial, emotional and physical tolls that would make two SETs unlikely for most patients.

    I don't think the article said if this study was done on only US patients or a combination of US and international patients.  In many European countries with universal healthcare they only do SETs, but they have IF coverage so the financial issue of multiple IVFs is moot.

    TTC since 8/2004
    Me - DX Hashimoto's Disease, Hypothyroid, Rheumatoid Arthritis
    DH - DX Azoospermia - Sertoli Cell Syndrome
    DS-IUI #1-4 BFN IVF #1 - BFP! It's a boy!!!
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • For my first three transfers we struggled with knowing that we only wanted to transfer one but being convinced by the RE and nurses to transfer 2.  This cycle, we were sure that we wanted to transfer one and whatever the outcome I am so happy we did.  The other 3 cycles we spent half the time worrying about what we do (mostly financially) if we were pregnant with twins.  This time, our sole focus is on getting a BFP.

    Fortunately, we have excellent IF coverage which will allow us to try some SETs.

    TTC #1 and Only Since August 2008 DH: Severe Male Factor Infertility (Diagnosed July 2009) Me: Clean bill of health 2 IVF w/ICSI cycles + 2 FET = 3 BFP = 3 Chemical Pregnancies FET #2 = BFN Tired of IVF - Trying for a miracle with IUI IUI #1 - 1.1 Million Motile = BFN Surprise Natural BFP on 1/10/12...Praying this is our take home baby
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"