I am almost embarrassed at how cheap Shawn's was. He wanted one that wouldn't scratch and after researching it, tungsten was our best choice. I really like the ring that he chose and it looks 100% brand new after 2.5 years of wear, but under $100? Really?
Todd's was more than mine, that's why I was curious. It is really thick, but it was several hundred more than I thought it would be. I can't complain too much though b/c when you add both of my rings together, I'm only paying 10% of what he paid. My ring is getting recoated, so I feel naked without it--plus I'm sure I'll get some looks when I have Josie without it!
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
I am almost embarrassed at how cheap Shawn's was. He wanted one that wouldn't scratch and after researching it, tungsten was our best choice. I really like the ring that he chose and it looks 100% brand new after 2.5 years of wear, but under $100? Really?
Same here! Jer wanted tungsten for the same reason and after 3.5 years, it still looks new for around $100.
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
DH is super picky and designed his own at the jewelry store. We paid far to much for it.
Mine still doesn't fit since I had K and really I dont think anyone really notices. I never look at anyone elses finger unless thier ring catches my eye. Maybe that is just me. I do wish my ring would fit though. Maybe I should try it again since I have been working out.
Re: wedding band poll
Same here! Jer wanted tungsten for the same reason and after 3.5 years, it still looks new for around $100.
DH is super picky and designed his own at the jewelry store. We paid far to much for it.
Mine still doesn't fit since I had K and really I dont think anyone really notices. I never look at anyone elses finger unless thier ring catches my eye. Maybe that is just me. I do wish my ring would fit though. Maybe I should try it again since I have been working out.