Parenting after a Loss
Options

Did I have a "natural" birth?

A comment someone made today got me wondering whether or not people would consider my birth "natural"?  I had to be induced because of low fluid, but the cervix softener did the trick and skyrocketed me into labor.  I never ended up needing the pitocin, and didn't have any other type of medication. Not that it makes a bit of difference, just curious if this is considered a "natural" birth by other peoples standards?
Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml

Re: Did I have a "natural" birth?

  • Options

    I don't think I would say natural...as far as going into labor and delivery naturally.

    But if you didn't have any pain meds I would say you had a "pain med free birth".

  • Options

    There has been a lot of discussion on the Natural Birth board about what constitutes a natural birth.  I guess it really varies on the person.  Some people think that any intervention at all means your birth wasn't natural.  (And by that definition, I think my home birth would be called "non-natural," because I had to have an IV due to dehydration!).

    I think I would probably call yours a natural birth.  A friend of mine had her water break early, but then ended up needing a foley bulb because she didn't start contracting soon enough.  She didn't have any other interventions or pain meds, and I consider that natural.  I don't think yours is that different.

    Traveling the world with my girls - born 12 months and 18 days apart.
    <a href="http://s5.photobucket.com/albums/y161/putalittlepolkainyourdot/?action=view
  • Loading the player...
  • Options
    I was induced because of low fluid also, but went pain-med-free. I consider that natural. Anyone who wants to argue with me, can suck it. I'd like to see them endure pitocin-induced contractions and go without meds.
    missed miscarriage began 04/08, ended 07/08 Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker BabyFetus Ticker
  • Options

    I would consider it a med free natural labor. I hate all the nuances. I consider a labor "spontaneous" natural labor if it occurs without induction aids. But all labors without pain meds I consider natural. JMHO though. Yay for you! You did great!

     

     

    image

    9 angels in heaven-3 in my arms and 1 in the NICU                                                                                                                                    
    Mono/di twin girls: Josephine born to heaven and Evangeline born Earthside at 25w

    image

    image

  • Options

    imagelovesinthehouse:
    I was induced because of low fluid also, but went pain-med-free. I consider that natural. Anyone who wants to argue with me, can suck it. I'd like to see them endure pitocin-induced contractions and go without meds.

    THIS!

    I was induced with pitocin but otherwise was med/intervention free.  I consider that natural.

    Lilypie Second Birthday tickers Lilypie Pregnancy tickers
  • Options
    Thanks for the feedback ladies!  I really had never thought much about it until I heard a fellow mom telling someone today that if you were induced you couldn't say you had a natural birth.  I had always considered myself having gone natural. :)  At the end of the day, who the heck even cares? As long as the baby is here safe and sound that is all that matters! Thanks again! :)
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"