In general, if you don't want to post the actual numbers.
Someone below posted that their score was "barely 1100 when they were scaled to 1600", like that was a bad thing.
Mine were a combined 1170 on the 1600 scale, and that was good enough to put me in the top 5% of everyone in the country. I didn't think that was too shabby.
I know that the current SAT is very different from the older one, and not necessarily in a good way. I think that grade inflation has hit that, too.
Re: What were your SAT scores?
oh my! I don't remember. it was either 1040 or 1140 or 1400... ??? I remember a 1 and a 4 and it was 4 digits. it wasn't a priority to me though b/c most of the schools I applied to requested the ACT ... I got a 32 (out of 36, I think?.... that was SOOOO long ago!).
Kaden William 11/4/06 and Dawson Michael 6/30/10
Dawson's first birthday - at the zoo
Annelise 3.22.2007 Norah 10.24.2009 Amelia 8.7.2011
Halo, I had to go look at mine, too. I happened to be sitting near my filing cabinet and have my old school crap stuffed in there.
My ACTs were a 27 composite, which was a 93rd percentile.
DS - December 2006
DD - December 2008
I don't remember for sure, but I want to say that it was in the 1200ish range. I do remember that I scored exceptionally high on all of the language stuff and low/average on the math (math has always been my weak subject.)
I didn't take the ACT. In my school the SAT was standard and very few people took the ACT.
awww. that makes me sad! I would have been heartbroken if my parents responded in that way... I was lucky, my brothers had screwed up so much, they were pleased with anything I finished. lol.
1320 on the 1600 scale.
No one I knew took the ACT.
I couldn't even tell you where mine are???? maybe in a closet or the attic at my parent's house???
Christmas 2011
I went to a fancy-pants college prep school and my 1200 was pretty low compared to most of my classmates.
720 verbal, 710 math. So 1430.
Liam is 5!
I got a 1400.
In 1995 they "recentered" the scores so that it was a little easier to get a higher score, although the change impacted you more if you got a lower score. So a pre-1995 1500 and a post-1995 1500 were similar, but a pre-1995 1000 was higher than a post-1995 1000.
This is kind of funny - 1450 on the SAT, I think.
But...that was with a 790 verbal I think (It might have been 780), which made my math 660. I was far better at the verbal portion and I took the math portion w/out my calculator because I had forgotten it.
OK, now that makes more sense to me.
I took them in 1985-86. I wondered how I could have been so high on the percentage scale then, and so many people who took them more recently are leaving my scores in the dust. LOL
DS - December 2006
DD - December 2008
Oh, don't be sad. It's funny! Asian parents are so stereotypical, it's hilarious. They weren't being mean... just Asian.
Lol. So true. At least you have a good attitude about it.
Rarely anyone takes the SAT here, but I did take it. I don't remember what I got, but 1310 is in my head. Or maybe it was 1120. Who knows.
I got a 31 on the ACT the first time and a 33 the second time.
I got 1080 on the SAT when I was in 7th grade. I was asked to take it because I was part of a study done by Northwestern University involving kids who were on the gifted track. When we moved to our new house, I was putting away a box of letters, report cards, etc. that belonged to my DH. I found a letter that showed my DH was part of the same study. He is off the charts genius and scored waaaaay better than I did.
I got a 32 on the ACT.
You take my ovaries, I take your yarns.