But who is not planning on rear facing until 2? I don't plan on it and am totally respectful if you choose not to or to rf your child until two. I was just wondering the stats. I will not respond to criticism or support. That is not the purpose of this post.
Re: Truly, 100% not trying to start a "thing"
You should make a clicky.
We will be RF 'till college, haha.
Knees are made to bend.
We will rear face until DS is no longer comfortable. I figure by the time he is uncomfortable, he will be able to express that he is uncomfortable with words and/or gestures.
Lots of kids sit indian style/legs crossed when rear facing. Honestly, its not that big of a deal. Don't turn them just because you think their legs are too long. They will tell you if there is a problem. Kids are good like that.
Both, if LO reaches 20 lbs before 1 year, they should still be rf at least till 1 year.
Just in case anyone wants more info:
https://www.cpsafety.com/articles/StayRearFacing.aspx
Sorry it's not a clicky, I don't know how!
I amazes me how quickly things change. I remember my grandmother being all upset when my mom put my sister (she's 22 now) in a (front facing) car seat because "what if she spit up?! Eleventy! You're the meanest mom ever!". And my MIL brough my BIL home wrapped in a blanket and put on the floorboards at her feet and held most of her other kids in her arms in the front seat.
Now kids are in carseats until they're 10.