Is it really possible to not have a due date? I know doctors sometimes change due dates depending on how the baby is measuring, but everyone in the family was asking when she was due and she said they hadn't given her a date, but it would be "sometime in September"

At the same time, she knows she was 16 weeks at her last ultrasound. My response is "WTF?"
Re: Question spurred by SIL's doucheyness
TTC #2, Operative hysteroscopy March 2011; IVF #1 long lupron protocol April 2011-cancelled due to poor response; IVF #2 flare protocol May 2011=hospitalization due to abdominal hemorrhage during ER and no fert due to MFI issues. Moving onto international adoption from Moldova January 2013!
I agree
TTC#1 Chart
TTC#2 Chart
IUI #1 - #4 (repronex trigger) = BFN
IUI#5 on 10/28/2008 ** BFP 11/10/08 ** EDD 07/21/09 *** It's a GIRL (07/14/09)
med/treatment free BFP 06/28/10. EDD 03/05/11 *** GIRL #2 (02/23/11)
beta#1 @ 17dpo = 1296 .... beta#2 @ 19dpo = 3034
it's the Bug and Baby Belle!
Chart/Blog
Nothing breeds faster than Crazy
The above is likeliest, but there has been a movement recently (to which some OBs ascribe - even put it before ACOG, but it was shot down as official policy) to eliminate the idea of an EDD. People get really caught up on it, and really, it's artificial. It doesn't mean anything - the baby can come 3 weeks before that and be full-term, or 2 weeks after and be perfectly healthy.
And while they can accurately date pregnancy, giving an edd sometimes creates problems with both mandatory and elective inductions. Some doctors prefer to give a week or even up to a month of time in which the baby will likely appear/be full term.
So she isn't necessarily crazy or wrong.
Gabriel Ross - August 24, 2009 * Vivienne Rose - May 1, 2012
My Blog
Gabriel Ross - August 24, 2009 * Vivienne Rose - May 1, 2012
My Blog
Chart/Blog
Nothing breeds faster than Crazy
This is what I was wondering, knowing how much people get bugged when their EDD approaches.
I'm placing my bet right now that she is going to induce or get a C-section on my wedding anniversary. This would just follow a pattern that started three years ago.
Chart/Blog
Nothing breeds faster than Crazy
I do there was a movement for a while to try and not have defined due dates because of the inaccuracy of dating by LMP and the disappointment pregnant women felt when the due date came and went without giving birth. So they would say "early February" or "late March".
Maybe your SIL and her dr. are just taking this a step further.
*shrugs*
I have an even better theory. Her dr. said 16 weeks, but that would have put your brother(?) OOT at the time, so your SIL is trying to cover her tracks.
Or would that be bad???
easjer, that is freaky that you and I answered almost exactly the same way, totally independently.
Jinx!
Chart/Blog
Nothing breeds faster than Crazy