I know you have probably heard this before, but if it is news to even one person, then it will be worth it!
My DH is a family medicine resident, and was reviewing a 2nd ultrasound the other day for a lady who was very excited about having a daughter. Turns out, the boy was just being shy.
She's really upset now as she has purchased tonnes of girl stuff and already painted the nursery in pinks.
Just a reminder that it's not often that they make this mistake, but it does happen!! Also, it's much easier to make this mistake (thinking it's a girl when it is a boy) than the other way around.
Re: PSA: Careful warning to team pink
This happened to my cousin. It's definitely something to keep in mind.
This was much more common in the early days of ultrasound where they tended to look for something between the legs to see if it was a boy and to look for the absence of something between the legs to see if it was a girl.
Nowadays, they look for actual girl anatomy. We were able to see the three lines very clearly on our ultrasound. Those three lines are the female anatomy. So, our ultrasound tech didn't just look for something to be missing -- she identified what she was seeing as female parts.
Ditto. The tech didn't tell me "Well, I don't see a penis - you're having a girl!" She said, "See that? That's what labia look like on an ultrasound."
I don't think I really have to worry about delivering a boy this summer.
I am SOOO nervous about this and have yet to pull the trigger, so to speak, on any girly shopping yet.
I'm not a fan of the multiple unneeded U/S but am seriously considering forking over 100 bucks to do one of those 3d things...
Joaquin's hospital and Isela's birth center med & intervention free "hypnobabies" birth stories
I promise you hun, this just happened last week.
I realize that if you get a good money shot, you're fine, but realize that not everyone does!!! I just want those who didn't get a 100% good look to be careful, that's all.
I'm not worried, even though we had an early u/s. The tech is amazing, and our little girl is not shy. We got a great shot, and the tech could clearly identify the labia. Obviously, I still have another u/s at 22 weeks to confirm, but the tech is 100% sure, and, like I said, it was very obvious.
I understand there is a risk it could be wrong. Its never exact until the baby is in your arms. I do think all these posts about how it could be wrong are not needed. Yes, it happens occassionally, but a lot of things do. Give it a rest, and let us enjoy our girls until proven otherwise (if ever).
pPROM at 27 weeks, Birdy born at 28 weeks at 2lb 7oz.
Not really...when they say boy it's almost alway a boy (I would say always but I'm sure there is a story out there where it was a girl). The umbilical cord is what makes a boy look like a girl.
This is the same thing with our u/s and the Dr. went back and chek about 4 times just to make sure and he kept getting the same shot! So I am not to worried about it!
When I worked at a return desk many years ago I had a lady come in with all her girl stuff because she ended up with a boy.
I also have a friend who was told she was having twin girls (around 14 weeks which is too early) and when she went in for an u/s at 20 weeks was told they were twin boys!
my brother & SIL had a healthy baby girl this past June...after being told 2x that it was a boy.
my poor niece wore boy clothes for the forst 4 months of her life.
look at the birds | bless this food
::raises hand:: I was Michael T. from the time my mom had her big u/s until I was born and she found out I was actually a girl. This was, however, with u/s machines of the 1980s. Like I said before, I think that now, although there's still a chance of identifying the incorrect sex, the chance is slim either way. U/s technology is better and techs can better identify the anatomy of both sexes, and not just rely on whether there is/isn't something that looks like a penis.
ditto!! this was ours. It was so clear that we had a girl. She had her little legs wide open. No mistake