My OB practice doesn't do them until 12 weeks (unless you are high risk, previous m/c). I feel like I'm the only one who has this?! Do all yall that have had a u/s already go somewhere where that's just the norm? Or did you have it for a special reason? 12 weeks for for.ev.er away, and I can wait, I just wonder why everyone else on Earth has already had one.
Re: Not having an early ultrasound?
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~Kari~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
Edited: I should say he won't do one if he feels everything is healthy and if the patient doesn't want one.
Right. In my particular case I suppose an early u/s isn't "necessary" but us very much appreciated. But to say its unnecessary for everyone is a bit too general.
I have no problem waiting until 12w, I'm just surprised so many people have them earlier, which is why I wondered whether it was for a specific reason or just protocol with their doctor. Oh well, 5 more weeks!
Can you cite a source for these risks you're talking about? I find it hard to believe considering how common they are and how often specialists use them.
Married my love 6/11/11 | MMC 10/11/11 | Eliza Frances born 9/18/12 | Rhett Garland born 2/24/14
https://www.fda.gov/Radiation-EmittingProducts/RadiationEmittingProductsandProcedures/MedicalImaging/ucm115357.htm
"Even though there are no known risks of ultrasound imaging, it can produce effects on the body. When ultrasound enters the body, it heats the tissues slightly. In some cases, it can also produce small pockets of gas in body fluids or tissues (cavitation). The long-term effects of tissue heating and cavitation are not known.
Because of the particular concern for fetal exposures, national and international organizations have advocated prudent use of ultrasound imaging. Furthermore, the use of diagnostic ultrasound for non-medical purposes such as fetal keepsake videos has been discouraged."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12509108
"Acoustic exposure from modern ultrasonographic devices is capable of disturbing biological tissue to varying extent depending on the type of ultrasound examination and the particular tissue under investigation. There is no strong evidence that these biological effects present a serious health hazard, however, knowledge is incomplete, particularly from human studies."