Hi, I was due May 17 and am now about 40 weeks 4 days pregnant.
I have been excited and committed to a natural birth but the practice doesn't want to go beyond 42 weeks.
My pregnancy has been totally normal and very healthy (had a stress test today and baby was totally fine,) but my midwives are concerned about the general risks associated with post-term pregnancy - placenta deterioration and meconium aspiration.
My midwife wants to schedule an induction at the very start of the 42 week mark which would be May 31st.
My mother went ten days late with my sister and I so I always figured I would go a bit late and the first day of the 42nd week seems a little aggressive to me.
I take the risk factors seriously and won't let the pregnancy go on indefinitely but curious to know what your cut off would be and why. Would you have it on the 31st or would you go longer (till when) and why?
Thanks for your perspective.
Re: Help needed WWYD : scheduling induction(?)
For my piece of mind, I would go with the 31st. I too fear the placenta deterioration and passing of meconium.
Have you tried any of the natural ways to kickstart labor? For instance, nipple stimulation, sex, acupuncture, etc?
BFP 3/29/2014 2u2 Let's do this!
This. I know some people hate it, but castor oil too and black cohash too. They helped me (I still had to be induced, but at least contractions had started - and then stopped a few hours later, hence the induction - which helped make my cervix ready and the induction went quickly (8 hours of labor) and i was able to avoid the epidural).
42 weeks is actually pretty generous. That was my practice's policy too but a lot of places don't even like to go that long.
I would not go beyond 42 weeks with a well dated pregnancy. I feel like a lot of stories from 20+ years ago predate ultrasounds and good dating of pregnancies, so they're just not that relevant.
My doctor would be pushing pretty hard by 10 days past due, so 14 is actually about as lenient as you can get.
Natural Birth Board FAQs
Cloth Diaper Review Sheet
Agree with this. And 42 weeks sounds really generous to me. I'm sure there are a lot of practices who wouldn't let you go that long. GL - hopefully you can kickstart labor on your own!
***Twin fraternal girls born at 35w6d in 12/2008***
My due date was actually the 18th and I'm getting impatient as well.
I think that 42 weeks is generally reasonable. And I'm pretty anti-induction for the most part.
Honestly, you have plenty of time to go into labor naturally!
Mama to Sebastian, born 9/2010
My Ovulation Chart
I'm pretty passionate about low intervention births, and I'm personally comfortable being induced at 42 weeks. Keep in mind there are many days until then and you will most likely not need to face an induction. You might go well into week 41 though!
If I am understanding correctly, you would be induced at 42w0d, right? What feels aggressive to you?
In doing the induction, I'd still prefer gentler methods with the hope that my body is somewhat ready on it's own, and measures apart from pitocin might be all that is needed.