Actually the threat of toxoplasmosis is highly overblown. If you are a person who has had pets particularly cats for any period of time, or has engaged in gardening as a regular activity the odds are that you have already been exposed and are immune to toxoplasmosis, it is a disease that you can get only once and generally most people think they simply have a cold. However, if you are someone who hides out in a bunker to avoid illnesses than toxoplasmosis might be a real risk. I had a baby born still at 18 weeks and I can assure you that it was not because I scooped the litter or planted pansies. Y
If she has a boy fetus it might see the penis and be born a homosexual. She needsto quarantine his crotch until after she has the baby. The peen is awfully close to the anus and she needs to avoid *** while pregnant.
OP, for someone who says "I am good at pretty much anything I take on" you are pretty terrible at spelling and grammar....and sanity.
Also, you claim to be a perfectionist but you have a lot of glaring typos, spelling and grammatical errors in your blog. Maybe spend more time proofreading and less time reading "millions" of BS books with false data.
That was awesome! Just proof that crazy people can have babies too. She is gonna have some purdy roots in the next 10 months. Her husband should have checked the "sane" box when ordering her up.
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
I really have nothing to say about the post b/c it has no basis in fact, and OP is obviously crazy... but MrsPrevost, I saw your siggy, and had to comment- my EDD was 6/14/10, and DS was born 6/20/10. His name is Asher too! Best of luck!
Ok, guys! Just to set the record straight and stop getting you upset, so that YOUR baby wouldn't be gay lol
I am in NO WAY suggesting that miscarriages or chemical pregnancies are a mother's fault ( except for those who exposed themselves to substances known to cause miscarriages and birth defects). I am simply stating that for my peace of mind I would like to avoid any kinds of situations that mind in any way influence the development of my baby. I realize there is a 25% chance of miscarriage and there's nothing that can done about that- mistakes in DNA just happen- it's no one's fault. So please, please, please, take this as a "this is how I chose to approach it", rather than feeling that you might not be doing enough. This is simply our choice, everyone does what works for them.
Also, for those who don't know, gardening= toxoplasmosis if not wearing gloves. Maternal stress is linked to learning disorders, as well as sexual orientation.
You know, I would think that this, being a community of pregnant women and mothers, would show some respect to other mothers and women by using polite language and giving people the benefit of a doubt. IF this is how you're behaving towards other women, then I don't know what kind mothers you are.
I've had a few women simply tell me that they disagree with me, at which point I'd correct them explaining that they misunderstood what i was trying to say. That's how normal people behave.
Since when do we ridicule other people's healthy choices? ...oh wait, since always, because that makes us feel inadequate.
And for that "nice" person who inquired whether this causes me negative feelings- no it doesn't- all it does is bring traffic to my blog, so thank you.
Oh and one final thing: my chart- I don't have one online, however without being snide or nasty to you, it was very clear based on it when i ovulated and when the implantation happened. It is the fertilized egg that produce Hcg from what i read, so it's very possible to test at 6DPO and get a positive, I'd read some posts with women finding out at 5DPO.
Sorry to have to correct you, but in actually, the fertilized egg doesnt produce HcG until it's implanted...it's the HcG that tells your ovaries that there's a baby in there, and that they need to keep producing progestrone to keep the pregnancy going. Not only that, it can take several days post implantation for there to be enough HcG in your urine (it has to pass through your blood stream and be metabolized first) to trigger a BFP on a HPT. In some women (like those that use an IUD for birth control), eggs can be fertilized but never actually implant...because implantation doesnt occur, no HcG is produced, so the ovaries never get the cue to keep producing progestrone,and the uterus doesnt think it needs to be there anymore, which starts the sloughing process. Being a former Paraguard IUD user, I know this for a fact...that is what they are designed to do. So unless your eggs move through your fallopian tubes at warp speed and implant faster than the average human (which is possible - we all operate differently - though not likely), it's highly unlikely that you would have received your BFP on a HPT 6DPO...on a blood test at the doc? Sure...they can check for MUCH smaller amounts of HcG. Sounds more like your charting is WAY off and you're just going by your chart.
I commend your attempt at researching the hell out of everything; - Lord knows I did the second I found out I was pregnant; however, I hate to say that it seems the places you're finding your data seem to be a little sketchy at best, since you seem to be getting a lot of incorrect or invalid information...and being a blogger, you're passing information on to others like you're some sort of expert...to the folks that have the correct info, it makes you look naive and ill-informed. No offense.
Ummm, actually you're wrong. Every twin pregnancy is high risk. Maybe you're the one who should do some research. But this isn't a thread about twin pregnancies. I came here because I heard OP was BSC.
Yep, she is.
no. they're not. Maybe YOUR ob considers all twins to be high risk, but that most certainly is not the case everywhere. Is there a higher chance that your pregnancy will become high risk? Absolutely. Does a twin pg automatically equal high risk? no, it doesn't.
I have 3 friends who had home water births with their twins. I have 3 others who did have high risk pregnancies with their twins...but their twins were not the only cause. I know others that had their babies in hospitals without being considered high risk at all as well.
Off subject, but I felt compelled to respond to this.
So I guess it's insurance fraud every time I go to the OB and they check "high risk" and my insurance is just paying for me to see perinatologist routinely for sh!ts and giggles? Yes I am high risk regardless of whether or not I have complications (which I have not yet). You are getting "high risk" and "complicated" mixed up. The other PP is right - any OB who DOESN'T consider twins high risk seriously needs to be questioned. I won't even go into my opinion about a twin home birth.
Ummm, actually you're wrong. Every twin pregnancy is high risk. Maybe you're the one who should do some research. But this isn't a thread about twin pregnancies. I came here because I heard OP was BSC.
Yep, she is.
no. they're not. Maybe YOUR ob considers all twins to be high risk, but that most certainly is not the case everywhere. Is there a higher chance that your pregnancy will become high risk? Absolutely. Does a twin pg automatically equal high risk? no, it doesn't.
I have 3 friends who had home water births with their twins. I have 3 others who did have high risk pregnancies with their twins...but their twins were not the only cause. I know others that had their babies in hospitals without being considered high risk at all as well.
Off subject, but I felt compelled to respond to this.
So I guess it's insurance fraud every time I go to the OB and they check "high risk" and my insurance is just paying for me to see perinatologist routinely for sh!ts and giggles? Yes I am high risk regardless of whether or not I have complications (which I have not yet). You are getting "high risk" and "complicated" mixed up. The other PP is right - any OB who DOESN'T consider twins high risk seriously needs to be questioned. I won't even go into my opinion about a twin home birth.
This, I love how it's posters without twins that say it's not high risk. Having twins does not mean that you can't have a healthy full-term pregnancy with no delivery complications but there is a higher risk of complications. I for one am so thankful for the high risk designation because without the more frequent ultrasounds and appointments my cervix issues and ptl might not have been caught until much later and I wouldn't have held on until 27 weeks.
But then again maybe I just did too much laundry...
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
Ummm, actually you're wrong. Every twin pregnancy is high risk. Maybe you're the one who should do some research. But this isn't a thread about twin pregnancies. I came here because I heard OP was BSC.
Yep, she is.
no. they're not. Maybe YOUR ob considers all twins to be high risk, but that most certainly is not the case everywhere. Is there a higher chance that your pregnancy will become high risk? Absolutely. Does a twin pg automatically equal high risk? no, it doesn't.
I have 3 friends who had home water births with their twins. I have 3 others who did have high risk pregnancies with their twins...but their twins were not the only cause. I know others that had their babies in hospitals without being considered high risk at all as well.
Off subject, but I felt compelled to respond to this.
So I guess it's insurance fraud every time I go to the OB and they check "high risk" and my insurance is just paying for me to see perinatologist routinely for sh!ts and giggles? Yes I am high risk regardless of whether or not I have complications (which I have not yet). You are getting "high risk" and "complicated" mixed up. The other PP is right - any OB who DOESN'T consider twins high risk seriously needs to be questioned. I won't even go into my opinion about a twin home birth.
This, I love how it's posters without twins that say it's not high risk. Having twins does not mean that you can't have a healthy full-term pregnancy with no delivery complications but there is a higher risk of complications. I for one am so thankful for the high risk designation because without the more frequent ultrasounds and appointments my cervix issues and ptl might not have been caught until much later and I wouldn't have held on until 27 weeks.
But then again maybe I just did too much laundry...
Ditto all this. Talk to any MFM and they will tell you that by definition, more than one baby = high risk. Risk means odds of something going wrong or having complications, not certainty. Someone can be high risk with twins and have a perfect, textbook pregnancy where they jog 6 miles a day and have a home water birth attended by a doula and fairies and unicorns and no tearing and 9 lb babies born at 40 weeks - but that doesn't mean that during that pregnancy they weren't at higher risk of complications than an average singleton pregnancy. Trust me, I know this because I had a very routine, complication free twin pregnancy - until my babies were born 4 months early and died. You know what the reason was per my OB and one of the country's most well-respected MFMs? Because they were twins. That is all. And that is the only thing I will ever say that in any way agrees with a word out of the OP's mouth.
And for that "nice" person who inquired whether this causes me negative feelings- no it doesn't- all it does is bring traffic to my blog, so thank you.
I haven't read all 6 pages of responses yet but this makes it clear what your intentions are by posting on this forum.
Oh My... someone's sure is in love with themselves, their voice and their image.
WOWZA.
There's some pretty asinine and stupid things being said on that blog. By you, TAO. And for that, I'm going to go ahead and wish upon you MASSIVE stretch marks starting in the 1st tri, hemmies by week 26, and just because of the gay comments, you get a colic-y baby as well.
Enjoy!
ps - the +hpt at 6dpo... I call bullchit. Bullchit. Bullchit. Bullchit. Be sure to let us know those beta numbers, K??? LYLAS!
Join us - Commit Random Acts of Kindness, and say
"I did it for Cricket"
Hi, I am new to this community! I just found out I was pregnant at 6DPO after 1 month of TTC and about a year of preparing to TTC. I am super excited, though a bit cautious and in disbelief because I tested so early and got a positive. I will be calling my OB to schedule blood work on Monday.
I wonder if such an early result might mean twins, since the hormone is doubled with twins.
Not true. My beta with my twins was the same as my friends beta with her singleton. Many women on the Multiples board have had the same experience.
Yeah that's what I'm kind of finding out. That's good, I guess. Twin pregnancies are high riskand while I'd love twins, if it's not it's better.
Ummm, WRONG AGAIN. Not all twin pregnancies are high risk. Do some research next time before you start babbling mindlessly. Please & thank you.
Speaking of being wrong ... yes, in obstetrics in general, all twin pregnancies are considered high-risk, (though there are certainly varying levels of risk within that, e.g. monochorionic monoamniotic twins are generally much higher risk than di/di twins). Simply because the mother and babies are at "higher risk" of many complications, miscarriage, PTL, etc. Any woman who is pregnant with twins should be getting more monitoring than an average singleton pregnancy. I had di/di twins with no complications, and my pregnancy resulted in two healthy full-term babies, but it was still considered a high-risk pregnancy and I got an ultrasound at every visit to make sure things were going OK. High risk doesn't mean something *will* go wrong, but that the risks are indeed higher than if the same woman were only carrying one baby.
Ummm, actually you're wrong. Every twin pregnancy is high risk. Maybe you're the one who should do some research. But this isn't a thread about twin pregnancies. I came here because I heard OP was BSC.
Yep, she is.
no. they're not. Maybe YOUR ob considers all twins to be high risk, but that most certainly is not the case everywhere. Is there a higher chance that your pregnancy will become high risk? Absolutely. Does a twin pg automatically equal high risk? no, it doesn't.
I have 3 friends who had home water births with their twins. I have 3 others who did have high risk pregnancies with their twins...but their twins were not the only cause. I know others that had their babies in hospitals without being considered high risk at all as well.
Off subject, but I felt compelled to respond to this.
So I guess it's insurance fraud every time I go to the OB and they check "high risk" and my insurance is just paying for me to see perinatologist routinely for sh!ts and giggles? Yes I am high risk regardless of whether or not I have complications (which I have not yet). You are getting "high risk" and "complicated" mixed up. The other PP is right - any OB who DOESN'T consider twins high risk seriously needs to be questioned. I won't even go into my opinion about a twin home birth.
Also, for those who don't know, gardening= toxoplasmosis if not wearing gloves. Maternal stress is linked to learning disorders, as well as sexual orientation.
I will bite... I work in medical research and I have never seen a legitimate study that links sexual orientation to maternal stress. I would like to see which studies you are referencing. Just out of a proffessional curiosity.
I am with you. I have been in clinical research for 12+ years now and my science nerd hat immediately goes on. Where are the studies? What were the methods? What journals were these studies published in?
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
Also, for those who don't know, gardening= toxoplasmosis if not wearing gloves. Maternal stress is linked to learning disorders, as well as sexual orientation.
I will bite... I work in medical research and I have never seen a legitimate study that links sexual orientation to maternal stress. I would like to see which studies you are referencing. Just out of a proffessional curiosity.
I am with you. I have been in clinical research for 12+ years now and my science nerd hat immediately goes on. Where are the studies? What were the methods? What journals were these studies published in?
I linked the ones I am aware of on page 4 somewhere. Please let me know if these have been debunked, I am curious.
OP.. I won't criticize you, but will offer some advice. Get out of the house and enjoy your pregnancy. Go out to lunch with friends, movies, etc. There is no need to isolate yourself in your home or limit your contact with others. If I understand correctly.. this is your first child. That means you have 9 months left of time for yourself before your world changes drastically (for the best). Have fun and enjoy it.
A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following:
(1) has a grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements)
(2) is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love
(3) believes that he or she is "special" and unique and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people (or institutions
I mean who else has a blog dedicated to self portraits? AYKM?
THIS THIS THIS!!! I WAS GOING TO POST THE SAME THING! TOTAL NARCISSISTIC PERSONALITY DISORDER!
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
Gender is socially constructed, not biological. The rules for "gender" differ from culture to culture, with no respect to biology.
Maternal anxiety does not cause homosexuality. If it did I'm pretty sure that there would be more homosexuals than straight people in society and we'd be experiencing a population decline rather than an increase.
You should check your sources, just because it's on the internet doesn't make it real sweet heart.
And you can call me what ever you like.
Look, I am only going off of what I've read over the years, and NOT on the internet, thank you very much.
Gender is socially constructed? Are you crazy? Maybe you misunderstanding the terms. Sex is the genitalia, gender is the mental understanding of its own sex. I am not talking about gender RULES. I am talking about how our BRAIN perceives gender. Boys aren't boys because society expects them to be boys. They are wired differently, they behave differently, their brain is VERY different from girls. That's what gender is. So when you take an external stressor, be it stress hormones, or environmental toxins, and apply it AT THE RIGHT MOMENT and CONTINIOUSLY ( that's why we're all not gay- obviously pregnancy is stressful), you might get a disassociation happening. Is what I am saying really so hard to believe? Does it make sense at all that it could happen? So if it could, doesn't it make sense to reduce those stressors to a minimum during pregnancy as long as there's a way to do it?
The study that I am referring to, exposed pregnant rats to stressors, measured the amount of cortisol released, and then found out that 60% ( i think that was the number) of those rats' pups exhibited homosecual behavior. And I know you're going to go crazy over the rats are not people thing, but we all work the same, hormones work the same, we develop the same way, and one can only study animals not humans, so that's all we have to go off of. And I'd rather be careful than not.
And I don't call people names, it doesn't make me feel better putting other people down, so I'll pass.
P.S. Doesn't it feel better to discuss things normally without ridicule?
It's "Gender Roles" not "Rules", you twit. Just another fine example that you have no clue what you're talking about. Keep believing everything you read, I'm sure your family will turn out f*cking great. And speaking as an RN who has had experience with OB/maternity and actual medical and professional education, so site that one, beotch!
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
I read the whole thread, and I'm still looking like this
But I DO have a question: Are you really licking your cat here?
Forget about gardening with no gloves - how about not licking your cat!
How much do we wanna bet that those poor cats will be dumped at a shelter (which I'm sure she will be refering to as "loving friends took them in") before that baby is even born?
Ummm, actually you're wrong. Every twin pregnancy is high risk. Maybe you're the one who should do some research. But this isn't a thread about twin pregnancies. I came here because I heard OP was BSC.
Yep, she is.
no. they're not. Maybe YOUR ob considers all twins to be high risk, but that most certainly is not the case everywhere. Is there a higher chance that your pregnancy will become high risk? Absolutely. Does a twin pg automatically equal high risk? no, it doesn't.
I have 3 friends who had home water births with their twins. I have 3 others who did have high risk pregnancies with their twins...but their twins were not the only cause. I know others that had their babies in hospitals without being considered high risk at all as well.
*sigh*
If any woman is expecting multiples and her OB isn't experienced in multiple births and doesn't refer her to a perinatologist/MFM, then she needs to run for the hills.
From babycenter: While the great majority of multiple pregnancies result in healthy babies, any pregnancy with twins or more is considered high risk. And the more babies you're carrying, the higher your risk of complications.
A woman carrying more than one baby is automatically considered to have a high risk pregnancy, and is at increased risk for pre-term labor. The Journal of the American Medical Association reported in 1996 that the optimum gestation for multiple births was 37 to 38 weeks, though with more than two, birth is likely to occur much earlier.
This, from Dr. Linda Burke-Galloway: Twins are a joy but remember their pregnancies are high risk. If you are pregnant with twins and no one has recommended you to see a high-risk specialist, make some noise . . . loudly. Remember, a healthy pregnancy doesn?t just happen. It takes a smart mother who knows what to do.
From UCSF Medical Center, where multiples are also treated as high-risk: Women carrying multiples have a higher chance of developing complications, such as high blood pressure and preterm labor. We schedule more frequent prenatal visits so we can watch for early signs of complications.
Those are just some examples. Head to the multiples board and ask them about high-risk pregnancies. I'm pretty sure most of their ObGyns also considered them high risk and referred them to a specialist as well. Anyone who is pregnant with twins or more and doesn't receive special care is putting themselves and their babies at risk.
another MoM...twin pregnancies ARE high risk, whether there are complications or not, with a twin pg there needs to be additional monitoring due to the number of things that COULD go wrong. It's great your friends had home uneventful water births (that in itself to me is just not the smartest route to go, but maybe that's just me), but there are many of us who had emergency c/s's, preemies and NICU stays...and I didn't have ANY complications until the last 2 days before my twins were born - if I wasn't being as monitored as closely as i was I would have gone into liver and kidney failure
but again, this isn't about multiples...OP is off her rocker and for some reason i can't stop reading
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
Re: Newly Pregnant - 9DPO
OP, for someone who says "I am good at pretty much anything I take on" you are pretty terrible at spelling and grammar....and sanity.
Also, you claim to be a perfectionist but you have a lot of glaring typos, spelling and grammatical errors in your blog. Maybe spend more time proofreading and less time reading "millions" of BS books with false data.
They look like a couple from Lifetime, where they look so perfect, it's scary. Like I'm afraid they may be serial killers.
Thank you! Your Asher is adorable!
June Bugs Blog
This is an "all time" nest/bump post. Right behind the realtors who were hooking up and caught on camera over on MM, IMO.
After 2 rounds of IVF & 2 rounds of FET, we were blessed with identical twin girls!
Sorry to have to correct you, but in actually, the fertilized egg doesnt produce HcG until it's implanted...it's the HcG that tells your ovaries that there's a baby in there, and that they need to keep producing progestrone to keep the pregnancy going. Not only that, it can take several days post implantation for there to be enough HcG in your urine (it has to pass through your blood stream and be metabolized first) to trigger a BFP on a HPT. In some women (like those that use an IUD for birth control), eggs can be fertilized but never actually implant...because implantation doesnt occur, no HcG is produced, so the ovaries never get the cue to keep producing progestrone,and the uterus doesnt think it needs to be there anymore, which starts the sloughing process. Being a former Paraguard IUD user, I know this for a fact...that is what they are designed to do. So unless your eggs move through your fallopian tubes at warp speed and implant faster than the average human (which is possible - we all operate differently - though not likely), it's highly unlikely that you would have received your BFP on a HPT 6DPO...on a blood test at the doc? Sure...they can check for MUCH smaller amounts of HcG. Sounds more like your charting is WAY off and you're just going by your chart.
I commend your attempt at researching the hell out of everything; - Lord knows I did the second I found out I was pregnant; however, I hate to say that it seems the places you're finding your data seem to be a little sketchy at best, since you seem to be getting a lot of incorrect or invalid information...and being a blogger, you're passing information on to others like you're some sort of expert...to the folks that have the correct info, it makes you look naive and ill-informed. No offense.
For once I agree with Emjay!
For once I agree with Emjay!
For once I agree with Emjay!
Off subject, but I felt compelled to respond to this.
So I guess it's insurance fraud every time I go to the OB and they check "high risk" and my insurance is just paying for me to see perinatologist routinely for sh!ts and giggles? Yes I am high risk regardless of whether or not I have complications (which I have not yet). You are getting "high risk" and "complicated" mixed up. The other PP is right - any OB who DOESN'T consider twins high risk seriously needs to be questioned. I won't even go into my opinion about a twin home birth.
Peanut Butter and Jelly!
<a href="http://s568.photobucket.com/albums/ss122/AliceNP/?action=view
Just want to say I was here!
OP you are BSC!
This entire post. LAWL. Staying up an extra hour to read it? WORTH IT.
I read the whole thread, and I'm still looking like this
But I DO have a question: Are you really licking your cat here?
::snort::
This, I love how it's posters without twins that say it's not high risk. Having twins does not mean that you can't have a healthy full-term pregnancy with no delivery complications but there is a higher risk of complications. I for one am so thankful for the high risk designation because without the more frequent ultrasounds and appointments my cervix issues and ptl might not have been caught until much later and I wouldn't have held on until 27 weeks.
But then again maybe I just did too much laundry...
Forget about gardening with no gloves - how about not licking your cat!
4 Fresh IVF cycles + 1 FET where embies didn't survive the thaw = 2 perfect little men!
sFET 11/9/11 - Beta 11/18 BFP!
Ditto all this. Talk to any MFM and they will tell you that by definition, more than one baby = high risk. Risk means odds of something going wrong or having complications, not certainty. Someone can be high risk with twins and have a perfect, textbook pregnancy where they jog 6 miles a day and have a home water birth attended by a doula and fairies and unicorns and no tearing and 9 lb babies born at 40 weeks - but that doesn't mean that during that pregnancy they weren't at higher risk of complications than an average singleton pregnancy. Trust me, I know this because I had a very routine, complication free twin pregnancy - until my babies were born 4 months early and died. You know what the reason was per my OB and one of the country's most well-respected MFMs? Because they were twins. That is all. And that is the only thing I will ever say that in any way agrees with a word out of the OP's mouth.
Going back to lurking and laughing.
I haven't read all 6 pages of responses yet but this makes it clear what your intentions are by posting on this forum.
DD2 11.17.08
Oh My... someone's sure is in love with themselves, their voice and their image.
WOWZA.
There's some pretty asinine and stupid things being said on that blog. By you, TAO. And for that, I'm going to go ahead and wish upon you MASSIVE stretch marks starting in the 1st tri, hemmies by week 26, and just because of the gay comments, you get a colic-y baby as well.
Enjoy!
ps - the +hpt at 6dpo... I call bullchit. Bullchit. Bullchit. Bullchit. Be sure to let us know those beta numbers, K??? LYLAS!
Lvisser was here.
Malakai - 8.3.09
Ezra - 12.1.11 ASD
Speaking of being wrong ... yes, in obstetrics in general, all twin pregnancies are considered high-risk, (though there are certainly varying levels of risk within that, e.g. monochorionic monoamniotic twins are generally much higher risk than di/di twins). Simply because the mother and babies are at "higher risk" of many complications, miscarriage, PTL, etc. Any woman who is pregnant with twins should be getting more monitoring than an average singleton pregnancy. I had di/di twins with no complications, and my pregnancy resulted in two healthy full-term babies, but it was still considered a high-risk pregnancy and I got an ultrasound at every visit to make sure things were going OK. High risk doesn't mean something *will* go wrong, but that the risks are indeed higher than if the same woman were only carrying one baby.
Well said.
Yes!
I am with you. I have been in clinical research for 12+ years now and my science nerd hat immediately goes on. Where are the studies? What were the methods? What journals were these studies published in?
I linked the ones I am aware of on page 4 somewhere. Please let me know if these have been debunked, I am curious.
Carina 12.28.2010 | Aurelia 9.23.12 | Chart - Round 3
Wow.. took me all morning to read all of this.
OP.. I won't criticize you, but will offer some advice. Get out of the house and enjoy your pregnancy. Go out to lunch with friends, movies, etc. There is no need to isolate yourself in your home or limit your contact with others. If I understand correctly.. this is your first child. That means you have 9 months left of time for yourself before your world changes drastically (for the best). Have fun and enjoy it.
THIS THIS THIS!!! I WAS GOING TO POST THE SAME THING! TOTAL NARCISSISTIC PERSONALITY DISORDER!
This exactly. That's one speedy zygote ...
My RE would LOVE to see your chart that showed implantation at 5DPO. That's well beyond his crazy science.
Nobody gets a BFP at 6DPO unless they messed up their chart.
I hope you do have twins. They will ROCK YOUR LITTLE CONTROLLED WORLD! Bwahahahaaaa!
It's "Gender Roles" not "Rules", you twit. Just another fine example that you have no clue what you're talking about. Keep believing everything you read, I'm sure your family will turn out f*cking great. And speaking as an RN who has had experience with OB/maternity and actual medical and professional education, so site that one, beotch!
How much do we wanna bet that those poor cats will be dumped at a shelter (which I'm sure she will be refering to as "loving friends took them in") before that baby is even born?
another MoM...twin pregnancies ARE high risk, whether there are complications or not, with a twin pg there needs to be additional monitoring due to the number of things that COULD go wrong. It's great your friends had home uneventful water births (that in itself to me is just not the smartest route to go, but maybe that's just me), but there are many of us who had emergency c/s's, preemies and NICU stays...and I didn't have ANY complications until the last 2 days before my twins were born - if I wasn't being as monitored as closely as i was I would have gone into liver and kidney failure
but again, this isn't about multiples...OP is off her rocker and for some reason i can't stop reading